Five Things You Need to Know: An Inside Look at Our Asymmetric Recovery
A ground level view from corporate executives suggests an economic recovery will take longer than we'd like.
One thing we know is that the economy is not the stock market, so a reader asked about what lies ahead for the remainder of the summer and into fall.
Just thought I would ping you and see if I have interpreted your commentary over the last few months correctly. From what I understand you are very long term bullish, but were expecting we were going to have this weakness we are experiencing now. Your plan was to build a list of stocks to accumulate during these rocky summer months as it would be a great long term buying opportunity. My question is if you have been deploying or are deploying into this period, despite the window of weakness having just begun (the 2 count on a full 13 expected). I'm sure there are numerous ways to approach this, if one sees 50% upside then the 10% down is palatable (although often not comfortable!) . Anyway, if you have a moment would love to know if my interpretation is correct or how you are approaching all this.
Yes, that is correct. We knew back in the late winter and spring that the probabilities favored a MONTHLY DeMark TD Sell Setup in May, producing a window of 4-16 weeks of weakness, and supported by lower time frames with both the WEEKLY and DAILY eventually aligning. Currently we are only on bar 2 down of what I believe will be a full TD Sequential 13 buy signal on the DAILY chart, but in the meantime at risk are both the disqualified TDST levels on WEEKLY and MONTHLY. TDST levels inform us of the present trend. Disqualified levels act as support until qualified. Those levels are 1219.50 on the WEEKLY and 1049.33 on the MONTHLY.
At any rate, because I believe we are nearer the end of the process of bottoming in individual stocks than the beginning, I have been buying some stocks in a variety of sectors (tech, consumer, multi-family apartment REITs and the water sectors) continuing the process of reallocating longer-term accounts to equities from bonds and metals. This process is not focused on indices, but individual stocks. Right now there is market risk, but I believe in many stocks no longer any individual security risk.
It is important in the selection process to monitor Relative Strength now (not momentum, mind you, because the two are very different). During the heart of bear markets, RS does not really work because all securities correlations converge and everything moves together. In more normalized markets (and for those who were not involved in markets prior to 1999, bear markets are not the norm) RS shows which securities are more likely to survive market risk and lead the way higher once the market risk is reconciled.
3. Best Buy to Downsize
Amid weak sales and growing online competition, Best Buy (BBY) plans to sublease space at its stores to smaller retailers, according to the LA Times. This is part of the much broader Socionomic trend we predicted would shrink everything from houses to retail stores to online communities.
"Big-box has already seen its heyday," Brad Thomas, a retail analyst with Keyblanc Capital Markets, told the LA Times. "Retailers just don't need as much space as they once did. Across the retail industry there is an effort to reduce the size of your stores as retail and purchases increasingly occur online rather than through brick-and-mortar stores."
Williams-Sonoma (WSM) has also been deliberately closing stores looking to recapture consumers through direct sales channels, catalog and Internet. At the Goldman Sachs (GS) dotCommerce Day conference earlier this week Willams-Sonoma Sharon McCollan observed that their data captures show customers were already shopping more than one company store, particularly in highly dense multi-store markets. Interestingly, the company's data capture was able to allow them to deliberate cut costs and close redundant stores without eating into sales, a strategy that a decade ago would have been both unthinkable and improbable without access to the data.
4. No, the Game is Actually Only Just Beginning
This is an interesting piece by Chris Hedges observing the decline of America and informing us that the revolution must start in America, not Egypt or Tunisia. This is the conclusion, but it won't spoil the piece for you to read it now.
"The game is over. We lost. The corporate state will continue its inexorable advance until two-thirds of the nation and the planet is locked into a desperate, permanent underclass. Most of us will struggle to make a living while the Blankfeins and our political elites wallow in the decadence and greed of the Forbidden City and Versailles. These elites do not have a vision. They know only one word: more. They will continue to exploit the nation, the global economy and the ecosystem. And they will use their money to hide in gated compounds when it all implodes. Do not expect them to take care of us when it starts to unravel. We will have to take care of ourselves. We will have to rapidly create small, monastic communities where we can sustain and feed ourselves. It will be up to us to keep alive the intellectual, moral and cultural values the corporate state has attempted to snuff out."
Game over. We lost. How's that for some Socionomics-related sentiment? But buried here in the rhetoric are our familiar Socionomics-based themes of fracturing into small, self-sustaining communities to help foster, or "keep alive," our "moral and cultural values." The author does not recognize that this is already happening, and the fact that it is happening necessarily means that the bull market for our elites has already peaked and is, in fact, over. It's not that I disagree factually with anything Hedges writes in his piece, only that, as I read it, he confuses the cyclical for the secular -- a mistake always made at the bottoms and tops of cycles. The assumption is that the trend is going to continue forever; i.e. the new economy, the Chinese century, even "permanent war." We've been here before. And we'll one day, many years from now, return once again.
5. Dire Warning About Human-Induced Climate Change
Speaking of having been here before, check out this dire warning from a U.S. congressman about the impact of human-induced climate change.
"Man cannot at his pleasure command the rain and the sunshine, the wind and frost and snow, yet it is certain that climate itself has in many instances been gradually changed and ameliorated or deteriorated by human action. The draining of swamps and the clearing of forests perceptibly effect the evaporation from the earth, and of course the mean quantity of moisture suspended in the air. The same causes modify the electrical condition of the atmosphere and the power of the surface to reflect, absorb and radiate the rays of the sun, and consequently influence the distribution of light and heat, and the force and direction of the winds. Within narrow limits too, domestic fires and artificial structures create and diffuse increased warmth, to an extent that may effect vegetation. The mean temperature of London is a degree or two higher than that of the surrounding country."
That is an excerpt from a speech delivered by Congressman George Perkins Marsh... in 1874.
(Via the Guardian's Environment Blog)
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.