Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

What We Learned From 2007's Performance


In order to glean the macro view of what transpired last year, it is useful to consider the performance of the principal asset classes as a point of departure.


2007 ended with a nasty hangover in the case of some asset classes and stock market sectors, but also with pockets of splendid performance. Reviewing the past year's investment returns makes for interesting reading, but also provides guidelines in some instances of what to expect in the year ahead.

In order to glean the macro view of what transpired last year, it is useful to consider the performance of the principal asset classes as a point of departure. I have deliberately kept the commentary rather brief as the detailed reasons for specific movements have already been covered in my previous articles.

(All charts are courtesy of

Click here to enlarge.

Commodities (+16.7%), in general, were the top-performing asset class, followed by the US 10-Year Treasury Note (+4.9%) and the S&P 500 Index (+3.5%). A money market investment, based on the average US 3-Month T-Bill rate, would have yielded a return of 4.4% – somewhat better than the S&P 500 Index (but less than the Dow Jones Industrial Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index as shown later in the article).

The other side of the coin saw the Dow Jones REIT Index declining by 19.2% and the US Dollar Index by 8.4%. The dollar weakness was naturally one of the factors contributing to the strength in commodities.

Stay informed, stay successful. Get your free two-week trial of the Buzz & Banter and get real-time information, observations and ideas from our Minyanville professors.

Interestingly, the performance table changed around quite dramatically during July 2007 as the subprime problems started to surface, resulting in an acceleration of the US dollar's downtrend and large-scale switching from stocks to bonds and commodities.

Click here to enlarge.

Zooming in on stock markets, the chart below shows the Dow Jones World Index gaining 8.4% during 2007. Top-notch performance was achieved by emerging markets (+28.8%), and specifically by China (+110.1%), India (+69.4%) and Hong Kong (+39.4%). On the other end of the spectrum, Japanese stocks (-5.5%) were in the doldrums and experienced losses.

As far as the major US stock markets were concerned, the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Index gained 6.4% – somewhat better than the S&P 500 Index's 3.5%, but behind the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index's respectable 9.8%. US small caps, as represented by the Russell 2000 Index, fared poorly in the light of being more sensitive to an economic slowdown and depreciated by 2.8%.

Click here to enlarge.

Click here for the detailed performance figures, ranging from one month to three years, for 55 global stock markets.

Looking in some more detail at the various US stock market sectors, seven out of the nine sector SPDRs recorded gains, whereas the Consumer Discretionary SPDR (-14.0%) and Financial SPDR (-20.0%) were the big losers. This weakness was offset by Energy (+36.1%), Materials (+21.5%), Utilities (+17.0%) and Technology (+15.4%), resulting in the major US indexes still ending 2007 in positive territory.

Click here to enlarge.

The stark difference in performance between the "diamonds" and "dogs" are illustrated clearly by the graph below comparing two of the top-performing industries – Oil Services (+50.9%) and Gold & Silver (+21.8%) – with three of the worst casualties – Housing (-38.9%), Banks (-24.6%) and Retail (-17.9%). The subprime fallout, needless to say, stands largely to blame for this dismal performance.

Click here to enlarge.

The credit crunch resulted in interest rates declining across the spectrum of the yield curve but to a larger extent on the short end, resulting in a steepening yield curve as shown in the diagram below. As the credit situation deteriorated, safe-haven buying resulted in yields of government bonds being pushed down across the globe.

Yield curve: January 4, 2007 and Yield curve: January 2, 2008

Click here to enlarge.

The US dollar's downward trend intensified as the implications of the subprime debacle started to unfold, resulting in the US Dollar Index losing 8.4% during the course of 2007. The largest beneficiary of the dollar's woes was the euro with a gain of 10.6%.

Click here to enlarge.

On the commodities front, oil (+52.3%) was the star performer on the back of a tight demand/supply situation and omnipresent geopolitical tension. Agricultural commodities (+41.1%) also shined as producers battled to keep up with increasing demand.

The precious metals complex benefited from the Fed's easier monetary policy and mounting concerns about rising inflation. Industrial metals, however, were the odd one out and faced declining prices as investors started factoring in slower economic growth.

Click here to enlarge.

The overriding message of the above analysis is the strong emphasis on defensive asset classes and sectors. There also does not seem to be any indication of last year's primary trends about reversing as we enter 2008, although some of 2007's laggards may bottom out during the course of this year.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos