Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

The Time for Bearishness Has Passed


Let's put Doomsday in perspective.

The Late Great Planet Earth

Last night from the comfort of my fortress-like safe house near the East River I watched a bit of ABC's "Earth 2100," a dire, semi-prophetic look at how the "perfect storm" of population growth, resource depletion and climate change "could converge with catastrophic results" for the planet Earth.

I made it about halfway through the show's 10 "Acts" - that's how the producers characterized the program's chapters, a savvy insinuation of something vaguely biblical, disastrous and wicked which this way cometh - before tearing open a vacuum-sealed turkey tetrazinni MRE and switching over to VH1's "40 Most Shocking Celebrity Divorces." Which proves you can lead a man to Doomsday but you can't make him shake his dark hunger for sleazy celebrity divorce scandals.

There are a lot of things that can be said about Television, almost none of them good. In a normal world, the amount of bungling involved in losing a once-captive audience to a do-it-yourself mish-mash of cat videos, malware and pop-up ads would result in prison sentences.

But that's not the point. The point is the Earth is doomed by 2100, brother. Read the portents and prepare for plague upon plague. And so if it seems as if Television really doesn't care about the future, What future?, well, now you know why. Of course, why bother with the future in the first place when you can dust off some programming from the past, repackage it, then spin it off as new? Anyone over 35 has seen "Earth 2100" dozens of times.

In 1979 I sat in front of a television set with my parents and watched the horror of "The Late Great Planet Earth." All it takes is a little late-1970s vintage Orson Welles to scar a young man for life.

"Events that are prophesied in the Bible are illustrated to show that civilization is headed for doomsday."
- Synopsis for "The Late Great Planet Earth," 1979. Orson Welles, based on the book by Hal Lindsey.

Ho, that reminds me: Abandon all hope ye who enter here. According to Dante Alighieri, that's the inscription carved just above the entrance to hell. The thing is, he made that up around 1306. Or at least stole it from someone else around that time. Welles and Lindsey no doubt stuck that in their pipe and smoked it some 650 years later. Which in my mind puts the Doomsday business directly on par with Prostitution as The World's Oldest Professions.

Indeed, Doomsday and Prostitution are intimately related in a deeply perverse dialectic that has spawned a hundred thousand cottage industries, from preaching to police work, perfumeries, nunneries and barbecue accessories. Kick that one around for a while and get back to me.

After the Crash

Sitting on my desk right now is a book titled, "After the Crash." It says it will explain to me the following:

1) Best Bets for My Money
2) Gold, Silver and Diamond Investments
3) How to Protect My Personal Property
4) Setting Up Survival Teams

"You may sense an economic downturn is upon us," the author writes, "but do you know how catastrophic it will become? A leading economist reveals the hard facts (including recent computer analyses) that prove we are on the brink of an abyss."

By the Hammer of Thor May it Be So. The book was written in 1979; a very popular year for the Doomsday profession.

Don't Make a Career Out of It

I am not interested in a making career out of Doomsday. On the one hand, bursting bubbles can be entertaining... for a while. But only bloated sad sacks and misanthropic fools make a career out of it. And in the end, they're left with... what? Nevermind. It was a rhetorical question.

Today, our most pressing disastrous concerns are, in order: Under the guise of recovery - bust the government - blame the capitalists for the failure - junk the Constitution and declare a dictatorship. It's a time-honored prescriptive course, and one I stole outright from here:

Chicago Tribune, 1934

Indeed. Like it says on the sign, "Plan of Action for U.S.: Spend! Spend! Spend! Under the guise of recovery - bust the government - blame the capitalists for the failure - junk the Constitution and declare a dictatorship."

The point is: either take your doomsday with a grain of salt, or simply take your salt with a grain of doomsday. In the end, the salt will be worth more. Which partly explains yesterday's bizarre outburst about "buying stocks."

Bizarre Outburst Explained

Yes, the economy will turn horrific before improving. But the economy and financial markets are not the same thing.

Recently I took some heat from people who demanded to know how I could claim we are in the middle of a deflationary debt unwind while at the same time saying I want to add exposure to stocks just below 800, given a 10-plus year time horizon.

Let's pause for a moment and consider where we are: The S&P 500 closed below 900 on a weekly basis just 56 times over the past decade. That's 520 weekly closes. Fifty-six below 900. All told there were 28 closes below 900 in the 2001-2002 period, and 28 recently. There have only been five weekly closes below 800 over the past decade, each one occurring this year.

Here's the thing. I agree there is a some probability we trade below 600, a lesser probability we overshoot and trade in a range of 400-500. But going down, and staying down, are not the same thing.

Ask yourself this: How long do you believe we'll stay at 400 if we decline to that level. Two weeks? Two months? Two years? Those time frames can be evaluated probabilistically. My contention is that if someone with a time frame beyond 10 years does some work on those probabilities, they'll reach very interesting conclusions about when to recommit some portion of their cash back to equities.

I guess what it comes down to is that the time to be bearish was in 2007 at 1500. And in Minyanville we were. That's not the same thing as saying now is the time to be bullish. But just as we spent time in the run-up to 1500 explaining why that move was bearish, not bullish, now is the time to prepare for the rundown to 700, 600, maybe even 400, considering why that move will ultimately be bullish, not bearish.

Putting the Pieces Together

But again, how does this fit with the deflationary debt unwind scenario? I am working with the following long-term investment thesis:

Step One: Asset Deflation Accelerates - Point of Recognition Reached
At this point I expect stocks to decline along with other asset classes as the deflationary debt unwind everyone thought was over reasserts itself with renewed intensity, perhaps by the fourth quarter of this year. But keep in mind the bear market began in 2000, so we are nine years into it already, and the heart of it will be the deflationary phase that corrects the prior over-leveraging.

Step Two: Embrace the Difficult
I have no idea what fundamental events will be blamed for this acceleration in asset deflation. What I do know is that it will seem foolish to recommit capital to stocks as we cross 800 to the downside. It will seem just plain dumb to do so when/if we cross 700 to the downside. And if we cross 600 to the downside then The Dumb will seem like geniuses compared to the Fools that bought 200 S&P 500 points higher. But I'll ask myself again, what is my time horizon? If it's longer than 10 years, then I can withstand 10 months of being Dumb and Foolish.

Step Three: Real Assets
Following upon Step One for a moment, I think we get one more major turn of asset deflation, hence a move for stocks below 800, and that deflation I believe will spill over into gold and other commodities too. At that point I want to be able to start adding exposure to real assets, commodities, particularly foodstuffs and softs.

What about the dollar in all of this? Short-term, I am looking for a respite here in the next week or so, followed by a potential qualified break (DeMark indicator terms) of 77.92, which will mean a low next year ~71 or so, possibly below 70 briefly. But, I think that is the bottom.

Again, I don't know why or how, and see the same fundamental issues everyone else does, but the technicals simply do not support a (further) collapse of the dollar. There is a non-trivial probability that we see a major currency readjustment in our lifetime, but I think it is years away. Meanwhile, silver, more than gold, seems to project some type of either currency attachment or at least some kind of industrial usage that makes it far more attractive than gold to me. I just do not believe gold will become the currency alternative people believe it to be.

Step Four: Priorities
I currently have exposure to Emerging Markets that I initiated several months ago through the Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and a number of other funds. I want to be overweight this group versus U.S. stocks, but with no exposure to U.S. markets currently, I will be looking to begin increasing it at 800 and below.

While some Minyanville professors, such as Ryan Krueger, have been a long time ahead of the curve with respect to commodities and Real Assets, that is a priority for me after the:

1) Emerging Markets;
2) Real Assets;
3) U.S. Stocks.

Viewed in that context, U.S. stocks are still not exactly bullish, at least not in a relative sense. But it's a long way from Doomsday.
Position in EEM

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos