R.I.P. Saturn, Saab and Pontiac?

By Scott Reeves Nov 28, 2008 9:15 am
GM may drop popular nameplates to secure bailout, stay alive.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+

General Motors (GM) may sell or drop its Saturn, Saab and Pontiac nameplates as part of the effort to secure a $12 billion federal loan. Earlier, the automaker had dropped the Hummer in response to declining sales and rising gasoline prices.

A final decision on putting the brands out to pasture hasn't been made, Bloomberg reports.

Reducing the number of brands may allow GM to sharpen its image and better target its advertising. The company will present its plan to Congress on December 2nd, where it will underscore its ability to repay the loan. A hearing is scheduled for December 5th and Congress may vote on the issue as soon as December 8th.

For its part, GM may run out of cash by January if it doesn't receive the capital injection.

But cutting the number of models offered won't be enough to save it. The automaker must also reduce debt levels and labor costs for retired and active members of the United Auto Workers Union.

Reorganization under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection may be the best way to solve the company's long-term structural problems, but CEO Rick Wagoner has rejected this notion and is seeking the bailout. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that some of the failing automaker's board members are willing to consider bankruptcy. This could trigger internal bickering when unity of purpose is needed.

Domestic automakers have consistently lost market share to imports -- especially Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC) -- and many in Congress fear the industry will vanish without federal aid. GM et al. now grab about 48% of the domestic market, a decline of nearly 20 points since the beginning of the decade.

With luck, the loans will allow US automakers to retool and develop new cars, including hybrids and fuel efficient models that will compete with the imports.

The first round of loan guarantees, if they happen, are likely to be a down payment and the automakers are almost certain to come back for more. Union contracts are a serious impediment, and it's difficult to see how Detroit can compete in the global economy as presently structured.

The Democratically-controlled Congress is unlikely to chip away at union protections and may place more mandates on the industry. This would create the worst of all possible worlds: Fleets essentially designed by lawmakers that have little or no experience in the private sector - and sure as hell aren't auto designers.

If so, the bailout would be money down the rabbit hole and would do nothing to strengthen General Motors, Ford (F) or Chrysler in the world market.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


(3)
2008-11-28 11:24:13
Saab
GM deserves whatever it gets for ruining Saab. At least Ford allowed Volvo some semblance of styling individuality (after a few horrible years) and integrated the latter's safety features into their core brands. GM's treatment of Saab...geez, I can't come up with words to describe it. Born from jets, killed by bureaucrats.
2008-11-28 15:28:04
Opel
I wonder what there plans are for Opel, a very solid car, hard to believe GM owned it so long.

Bye the way, try this great trading quiz. It tells you what kind of a trader you should be, and gives you many free tools http://www.freetradingquiz.com/ I got some really cool free stuff to help me get started trading.

Only takes five minutes, you will have fun, learn something about yourself, and get free tools and a free trading plan.
2008-11-28 15:31:30
GSA fleet
After the 1980's loan guarantees for Chrysler, GSA fleet was all Reliants, Horizons and Dodge rams for years. I think we end up with what was predicted here in M'ville....AmCar. Produced by the government for the government
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.