GM Tails Chrysler Into Bankruptcy
The long-awaited move leaves the US government as GM's majority owner. Washington is betting more than $50 billion in taxpayer money that its turnaround plan can transform GM into a slimmed-down, dynamic powerhouse in the rapidly changing global automotive industry - despite mountains of debt, labor disputes, high fuel prices, and anemic sales.
The GM bankruptcy will allow its new public-employee chieftains to more quickly downsize the bloated firm, shuttering dealers, ditching struggling brands like Hummer and Saturn, as well as rapidly renegotiating labor contracts. According to the Wall Street Journal, the protection of Chapter 11 bankruptcy will also enable the company to rid itself of nearly $80 billion in debt.
And although GM’s bankruptcy filing may speed its way through the courts, as did Chrysler's (and the company could emerge from bankruptcy as early as this week), the 2 failed automakers’ cases couldn't be more different.
First, the sheer size of GM -- with nearly 3 times the assets and a fraction of the debt Chrysler had when it filed for bankruptcy protection April 30 -- will make its proceedings infinitely more complex. Pacifying a web of creditors, dealers, labor groups, and investors will be no easy task.
In addition, when GM eventually does emerge from bankruptcy, around 60% of its equity will be owned by Uncle Sam, since more than $50 billion in government loans will be converted to equity.
By contrast, Chrysler used bankruptcy protection in part, to cement a sale of key assets to Italy’s Fiat, which will own the new Chrysler in conjunction with labor unions, while the government holds a small, less-than-10% stake. Congressional meddling into its new Detroit-based Frankenstein's monster could hold up decisions at GM, as major as which brands to scuttle to trivialities like which brand of paperclips to use.
The Obama Administration reiterated that government ownership will be transitory, predicting that GM could once again be a public company within 6 to 18 months. During that time however, competitors like Ford (F), Toyota (TM) and Hyundai can leap ahead as GM focuses on cleaning up old messes and charting a new path for the future. Analysts say, however, that a new government-enhanced GM could emerge with an unfair advantage over companies like Ford that didn’t need to be bailed out.
Finally, and perhaps more importantly, GM must regain the trust of a country whose loyalty to the brand was based not on quality craftsmanship or reliability, but on patriotism. Without a dedicated client based in the United States that buys its cars because they are superior to those manufactured by its foreign competitors, the restructuring of GM will fail in even its most modest aims.
The automobile may have been invented in the United States, but its construction was perfected elsewhere. The turning of that tide will be the ultimate test of this brave new era in American car-making.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
1. I don't think that the taxpayer will get out of this nearly as soon as is promised, if at all. If sooner, it is because we will all pay for it, dearly. If later, we will all be paying for it dearly. And not necessarily with money.
2. How does it help the US to bail out a bankrupt competitor of another major US company who also employs people?
3. The unions have put the royal screws to GM AND America!
4. This was a sweetheart deal paid for in advance with Presidential votes.
5. GM could have avoided all this if they had just built inexpensive, miniture and fuel-efficient versions of the Hummer!
6. Oops - that's 5, and now this is 6 things!
Why don't all the companies in the Dow saying they are bankrupt and it will leap another 30%!
Gee, a comapny owned by the government, the unions and a bunch of bondholders who (rightly) feel like they've been hosed. What could go wrong?
Oh, I almost forgot the punchline. This wonderful company is supposedly betting its future on the Chevy Volt...a car for which they haven't invented the batteries yet!!!!
Not to mentuion, who is this car for? Even if they meet their own lofty expectations and get some sort of electic car into showrooms by 2011, who is going to pay 40 thousand dollars for a car with a 40 mile range based on questionable technology. Has anyone heard how the battery life holds up when the heater or air conditioner is running? How about with the headlights on and watching a DVD? All I know is you better make sure you stay up to date on your AAA coverage. It sounds like you might end up being on a first name basis with the tow truck driver!
GM, Chrysler and Ford all made miniature, good-mpg cars, and Americans didn't want them. Didn't buy them. The Big Three lost money hand-over-fist on their weasels, and made most of the money they brought in (tho' insufficient to meet their obligations to debtors and employees) by making and selling BIG things: SUV's, trucks.
Now, per Obama decree, GM and Chrysler will be forbidden to import their most mpg-efficient cars, which are made overseas (and in Mexico) in partnership with Toyota et. al. Instead, "local manufacturing jobs must be protected" and those, and even wimpier cars, will be made here but at much higher cost than they presently are. So I get to
1. pay to bail out Government Motors - twice - and Chrysler - now the third time -
2. lose my A$$ on my bonds, and pay UAW for the privilege
THANK YOU SIR MAY I HAVE ANOTHER
3. pay for Government Motors to make cars even the Russians wouldn't buy
4. and pony up for a more-expensive version of a Honda made by GM.
Not. Will never own corporate paper again, nor any GM or GE or C or BAC or.. etc. products.
















