Cart (0)
business newsEPA's Greenhouse Gas Regulation Under Fire by Republicans
With donations from fossil fuel interests heavily favoring Republicans, the EPA finds itself in a tough spot.
PRINT
 |
|
During that time, companies in the fossil fuel industries gave more than $15.5 million to Republicans now in Congress, and only slightly more than $3.7 million to Democrats. Environmental groups, by contrast, gave primarily to Democrats, though their contributions were relatively small, totaling less than $1.8 million.
Michigan Republican Fred Upton, who has introduced legislation that would bar the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions, received just under $150,000 in 2009 and 2010 from the fossil fuel industries. House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, took in about $258,000 during the same time.
In the US Senate, West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin, an ally of the coal industry, received more from the fossil fuel industry than any other Democrat -- and, indeed, more than most Republicans -- in 2009 and 2010. Manchin has signed on to the Senate version of legislation that would strip the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.
Spending by both fossil fuel companies and environmental groups ramped up, according to the Center for Responsive Politics analysis, in the months leading up to the 2010 midterm elections, in which Republicans took control of the House of Representatives.
Since that election, the EPA has come under fire, with some in Congress -- primarily Republicans -- focusing on blocking the agency’s regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. While questioning the broad scientific consensus that carbon dioxide and other emissions are responsible for climate change, they say the agency’s actions could harm the economy, drive jobs offshore, and constitute a hidden energy tax. They have added language to spending legislation known as “riders,” which would prevent any funding for some EPA regulatory action, including regulation of greenhouse gas emissions .
Upton has said that EPA regulation would increase already-soaring gasoline prices. “These rules are about as out-of-touch with what the American people want as anything moving forward in Washington. ... High energy prices not only hurt households, they burden small businesses and farmers as well.”
The House and Senate are expected to vote on the legislation today. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Barack Obama say they oppose the riders, and Obama said Tuesday he will veto Upton’s bill. In a statement, the President said the bill would halt “common-sense steps” to protect Americans from air pollution and would increase dependence on oil and other fossil fuels.
Editor's Note: This article by Chris Hamby was originally published on The Center for Public Integrity.
Reprinted by permission.
Lasting through April 15, 100% of the donations made to The Ruby Peck Foundation for Children's Education will be channeled to the children of Japan as they attempt to find their footing following this natural disaster; and to kick off this drive, we'll pledge $5000 to get it started. Please do what you can, as it will add up, and thanks.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
