Fashion's Dirty Laundry: Forever 21
Knock-off company to knock down America's largest urban garden.
The Los Angeles-based chain is due to open a 90,000-square-foot store in Times Square in 2010. A new 80,000-square-foot store is slated to open in an Los Angeles-area mall later this year, and the retailer opened a comparatively modest 19,000-square-foot store in the Harajuku neighborhood of Tokyo -- their first in Japan, last April.
But the company has been hit with over 50 lawsuits in recent years, mostly from other designers who charge that the company has copied their pieces, down to the smallest details. Companies such as Express, Anthropologie, Anna Sui, Diane von Furstenberg, and Bebe (BEBE) have filed complaints, but most are settled out of court.
There was a notable exception: another Los Angeles-based apparel firm, Trovata, took Forever 21 to jury trial for allegedly copying seven pieces. The suit was based on trade dress protection, which differs from copyright protection in that it protects what's called "secondary meaning," like logos or details that become a company's calling card and associated with a brand in the public's mind (think of Ralph Lauren's (RL) polo player).
The case went to court in May, but was declared a mistrial. Just before a second jury trial set for early October began, the two companies settled.
Susan Scafidi, visiting professor of law at Brooklyn Law School where she teaches fashion law, says that Forever 21 seems to be committed to their particular technique. "It appears Forever 21 is just treating lawsuits as a cost of doing business," says Scafidi. "It's worth it for them to pay up when they get challenged for copying and they seem to prefer to do that rather than to seek a license in advance."
The private company was founded in 1984 as Fashion 21 by husband and wife Jin Sook Chang and Do Won Chang. It's since expanded to over 430 stores, the majority of which are mall-based, and 2008 sales of $1.3 billion.
But unoriginality isn't the company's only problem. A 2001 lawsuit, the subject of the 2007 documentary Made in LA, was brought by garment workers who claimed the working conditions at sweatshops to which Forever 21 subcontracted out their production were unhealthy and unsafe. The case went to the state level until it, too, was settled in December 2004.
L.A. garment worker Maria and her daughter lead the chants at a protest
Photo by Made in L.A. documentary
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter