Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Why Are People Worried About Foreign Direct Invesment?

By

If a foreign investor wants to buy an existing plant or a create a new one, it will have the same beneficial effects on output and employment as domestic-based investment.

PrintPRINT
One of the great head-scratchers is why people everywhere feel uncomfortable about foreign direct investment (FDI) in their country. This certainly was true in Europe during the days of American economic domination in the 1950s and 1960s and it was true in the US during the Japanese economic desert-bloom (it was pretty, but short-lasting) of the 1980s. And need I mention the reaction to forays by Dubai Ports World to take over various port facilities in the US or China's attempt to buy Unocal in recent years?

As they say in mob movies, it's not personal; it's just business. If a foreign investor wants to buy an existing plant or equipment or create a new plant and equipment, it will have the same beneficial effects on output and employment as domestic-based investment. This is especially true if the choice is between closing the existing facility or not having the new facility built and welcoming the new investors.

In addition, to the extent foreign-owned plants displace imports and re-export goods to other countries, i.e. a Korean-owned plant shipping goods to Canada, the current account deficit will be reduced. The administration has declared export-enhancement to be a national goal, and an import saved is an export earned, if I might meld the wisdom of Barack Obama with that of Benjamin Franklin.
The conditions for FDI increasing are simple:

1. The investor must see the business opportunity;
2. The currency must be seen as relatively cheap; and
3. The foreign exporter must be worried about rising trade barriers.

Viewed in this light, the Japanese automobile plants built in the US by Honda (HMC) and Toyota (TM) made a great deal of sense. Automobile manufacture in the US is still economic in the absence of the legacy costs faced by firms such as the old General Motors.

More Is Better


FDI as a percentage of foreign assets held remains at the lower end of a general range; some of the data points become unnaturally high or low as an artifact of the assets-held number and have been truncated for display purposes. Worse, though, is the recent decline in FDI as a percentage of non-residential fixed investment. Those red columns have been trending downward in recent quarters, and no good comes from that.



While some might look at this chart and say it proves the need for a weaker dollar to make American assets cheaper so haul out the printing presses and start cranking, or (shudder) that the US should start making credible threats to impose trade barriers, the real answer has to be that the US needs to become a more attractive place to invest. There are reasons China has become the world's dominant manufacturer, and not all of them involve an artificially suppressed yuan. Chinese labor is cheaper than American labor, by American standards China has no environmental, health, or safety standards and there is no word in Mandarin or Cantonese for "contingency-fee class-action lawsuit."

Once the US makes a concerted effort to, in the words of the late Walter Wriston of Citigroup, make the US a place where capital is well-treated, capital will start flowing into the US once again. The term "on-shoring" is being used for American firms reestablishing a domestic manufacturing presence to serve the US market; let's work to make this a reality for foreign firms as well.


< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE