Pirate's Booty
--Steve Sabol, NFL Films
As the boys of summer prepare for the playoffs, hardcore fans around the land are readying for an entirely more violent collision.
With football season upon us, our collective attention now turns to the metaphorical line of scrimmage in the markets. Tensions are high and the stadium packed, for the winner of the September battle could run the schedule into year-end.

The Bears unleashed an all out blitz in July, only to be caught flat-footed by Washington offensive coordinator Hank Paulson. The crafty veteran is a master of market timing patterns and he shrewdly called plays designed to punish those who over-pursued the weak side.
Following a summer when headlines trumped tan lines, starters returned to their turrets this week with game faces affixed. With one month left in the quarter and four remaining in the year, they’ll leave it all on the field for fear that if they don’t perform, they won’t make the 2009 roster.
It’s been over a year since credit scars first emerged and they were quickly dismissed as non-relevant bruises rather than potentially career threatening injuries. As more and more players—and, in some cases, entire organizations—were carted off the field, it became increasingly obvious that the game was forever changed.
The sub-prime scare morphed into arguably the worst financial contagion in history, a cumulative comeuppance born on the back of the tech bubble and exponentially magnified by experimental engineering gone awry.
After years of giving the star market drugs with hopes of masking the underlying discomfort, it’s begun the unenviable yet unavoidable process of taking medicine through time and price. It’s not fun—and it will take years to fully flush through the system—but it’s a necessary evil that must be endured.
We’ve already discussed the primary time horizons with which to view financial markets and that remains a viable and valuable context to any conversation. To be sure, the destination we arrive at pales in comparison to the path that we take to get there.
Getting Credit When Credit's Due
We wrote about the potential for a rally into the election on July 16th. It was an unpopular, variant view at the time but higher lows have since been made and the trend—however ginger—is still in tact.
The twist to the current plot is the yawning disconnect between equity and credit markets. While the former storm has shown moxie in recent weeks, the latter matter is an entirely different category in terms of the potential implications.

Much has been written about the $230 billion in debt that is coming due in Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) by the end of the quarter. These two troubled institutions remain elephants in the room that won’t go away. Well then again, perhaps they will.
There was a brief celebratory spark in the media and markets early last week when Freddie successfully financed $2 billion. As Kevin Depew mentioned on Minyanville, however, it was akin to a man finding a quarter in his pocket on the way to bankruptcy court.
Assuming the debt of Government Sponsored Entities is backed—a virtual lock given the unsettling consequences that would occur if it weren’t—the resolution of their equity would have profound implications for global markets through the lens of the dollar.
But wait, there’s more.
Financial institutions have $871 billion in debt coming due into year-end.
If corporate America can successfully roll those obligations and buy more time, odds are we’ll see a sharp upside equity rally.
If, however, sufficient appetite doesn’t emerge for that credit, the potential exists for an unmitigated equity disaster.
The boys on the Beltway know this all too well and we should expect a wave of announcements in the coming months designed to spur the herd higher.
Todd Harrison is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Minyanville. Prior to his current role, Mr. Harrison was President and head trader at a $400 million dollar New York-based hedge fund. Todd welcomes your comments and/or feedback at todd@minyanville.com.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The VIX/VXO is attempting the QB sneak. No mid-September 50 bips slash available this time around I don't think, but the OC in DC is watching.
The crew at 15th and F are crafty, and I bet they are crafting up something special.
Smoke and mirrors, gross market manipulation, constant government support and intervention and the fact that very few will benefit from systemic collapse, are what keeps this teetering sham from falling over.
Why are the powers that be making life so difficult for short sellers? Because things are so dangerous and fragile that aggresive short sellers represent an unacceptable risk to the system.
Whilst I am disgusted at the way the system is operating, personally, I am very opposed to short selling. I think it is an obscenity that some have made billions from betting on disaster. That is not right and downright unhealthy.
I spend 5 years up until August last year just trading shares, very successfully I should add, without even knowing that short selling existed.
Supporters of short selling claim it brings out bad news about a company that would overwise be masked and fudged. But if the system was operating properly and the regulators were on the ball that should never happen. What short selling does is provide bad companies with an excuse to explain a fall in the share price. I see it all the time.
I think the shuffling around in energy and the 'parents' trying to discipline the short views are symptoms of the confusion. Everyone knows something is wrong, but What exactly, they can't pin down.
The house of cards is staying up because of the pressure of the oil inside, like an inflated Brett Favre doll on a Packer Backer's lawn. When the lights go off, he turns into a deflated drunken sailor, passed out in his own vomit.
That's what the Service Economy is going to look like.
Real goods, real needs, real people and real credit need to be sifted out from the oversized box of packing peanuts before we end up sifting them out of the ashes.
Hopefully, Paulsen et al will hold up the price of energy (by intent or default) long enough for consumers to shift gears toward more sustainable ways of living without the Cheap Oil crutch.
The medicine is going to be harsh on our children either way.
"Money money money money money. We can't keep doing this Bob." - Mr. Dikker, "The Incredibles".
The late and much lamented Harry Browne made the point that the government's resources are limited, though they want to appear all-powerful. We have dodged disaster on so many occasions that we have begun to believe that Greenspan, Bernanke, et al can repeal the business cycle. Don't thinks so - the blow up doll is filled to bursting and the skyscraper of cards is swaying in the wind.
But, the temporary salvation may be "what will they do with all those dollars?". "They" almost have to keep investing them in US obligations to keep the Ponzi scheme going.
I guess it is human nature to label things "good" or "bad" but in retrospect the Great Depression "bad" and WWII "good and bad" set the stage for many years of remarkable prosperity. Dan is probably right - the medicine will be bitter but hopefully the results "good" will last a long time.
We have a long way to go, and the direction isn't up.

















