Dead Banks Walking?

By Bennet Sedacca Aug 25, 2008 2:15 pm
Short list of troubled institutions.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+

Editor's Note: The following piece was a collaboration with Minyanville professor Rob Roy.

"Dead Man Walking": Originally a phrase in a poem by Thomas Hardy in 1909, but later in a work of non-fiction by Sister Helen Prejean, A Roman catholic nun and one of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Medaille. Prejean later wrote ‘Dead Man Walking’ which became a hit movie in 1995.

Death Row: A term that refers to the section of a prison that houses individuals awaiting execution. It is also used to refer the state of awaiting execution, even in places where a special section does not exist. As of 2008, there were 3,263 prisoners awaiting execution in the United States.

The Last Mile: "I guess sometimes the past just catches up to you, whether you want it to or not. Usually death row is called ‘The Last Mile’. We call ours The Green Mile’—the floor was the color of faded limes."
-
Tom Hanks as Paul Edgecomb (The Green Mile)

Are there corporations that are "dead men walking"? When I first started in the industry in 1981 I was worried but about just one company, the Chrysler Corporation. Prior to that, Continental Illinois was in the forefront. Later in my career, in 1998, it was Long Term Capital Management, the hedge fund founded by John Meriwether, that captured my attention. Then we had Enron/WorldCom, and by early 2008 Bear Stearns became a worry and then a problem that needed fixing.

All of these events were isolated and dealt with, often with either direct assistance from Uncle Sam or an effort coordinated by America's benevolent/socialist government financial authorities. Markets would become unnerved, fear would grow, and then the government stepped in to make sure that the systemic risk that had finally come to the surface didn’t melt the entire planet.


Want top traders to sit at your desk and share their insight and ideas?
Minyanville's Buzz and Banter- 14 day FREE trial


But this is where it's "different this time" - not only is it different, I think it may be unprecedented in nature. When I look at my Bloomberg monitor each day that contains my 100 most important indices, companies, commodities, bonds, bond spreads, preferred shares, etc., I shudder. The reason for my concern is that my screen doesn’t have just one "problem child." It looks like a screen that contains many "dead men walking."

The Failed Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Experiment

I recently wrote a piece entitled A Tale of Two Markets, where I talked about the "Fannie Mae (FNM)/Freddie Mac (FRE) experiment." To me, that experiment has now clearly failed and a bailout/privatization/nationalization of Fannie and Freddie is probably being planned right now. While I have been expecting nationalization for quite a while, I am intrigued along with my peers and colleagues as to why the bailout is taking so long to accomplish. This is where, in my opinion, it gets interesting and dangerous from a systemic point of view. My hunch is that the reason for the delay is that the Treasury Department is "peeling back the onion" on Fannie/Freddie and finding out just how much of a mess the two of them are.

At last count, Freddie had Level 3 Assets of $151 billion while Fannie had $65 billion, for a not-so-paltry sum of $216 billion. When Freddie announced their results a couple of quarters back, it disclosed that most of its Level 3 Assets were of the "sub-prime" variety (the type of assets that started the whole credit crisis in the first place). The company's also littered with Alt-A mortgages and are leveraged to the hilt.

Just how bad is the news at Fannie/Freddie? On Friday morning, Moody’s downgraded their outstanding preferred stock 5 notches from A1 to Baa3 (a slight gradation above junk) and their Bank Financial Strength Ratings (BSFR) to D+ from B- (a one-half notch above D, which is reserved for companies in default). According to Moody’s:

"The downgrade of the BFSR reflects Moody’s view that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s financial flexibility to manage potential volatility in its mortgage risk exposures is constricted ... in particular, given recent market movement, Moody’s believes these companies currently have limited access to common and preferred equity capital at economically attractive terms."

Dead men walking defined. Moody’s went on to say:

"The GSEs' more limited financial flexibility also restricts their ability to pursue their public mission of providing liquidity, stability and affordability to the US housing market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac currently make up approximately 75% of the mortgage market in the US. A reduction in the capacity of these companies to support the US mortgage market could have significant repercussions for the US economy. In an effort to thwart broader economic effects, Moody’s believes the likelihood of direct support from the United States Treasury has increased."

"We the People" are about to become owners in Fannie and Freddie, whether we like it or not. The capital markets have shut on them both as their stocks trade in the $2-5 range, down from the $70-80 level just a year ago. And the yield on the outstanding preferred shares hovers in the 18-23% range: Quite the bargain if they keep paying, but also it's the market’s way of saying "Beware the value trap" as the preferred shares may pay another dividend or two, but that's about it.

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

(22)
2008-08-25 14:40:37
What a great article - I'll have to read this a few more times to be sure I'm digesting it fully.

Why is it that I feel so strongly that I am the only person in America who still believes that fraud is wrong? It seems that for at least the last three decades we have all wrapped ourselves in the flag of free-marketeerism as justification for fraud. Am I crazy or do I remember a time when accountants and GAAP were professionals and tools meant to help organizations comply with both the letter of the law AND the spirit of honesty? Today these are people and tools to hide reality, shade the truth, and take advantage of people with less access to information. That's not the action of the free market... it's the foundation of fraud!

It seems to me that people who took out mortgages knowing they'd never be able to pay the fully-amortizing payment after an interest reset committed... well, fraud. It seems equally to me that organizations that sold this trash and then booked the fully-amortizing payments as revenue even when borrowers paid the minimum or interest-only payments committed... you guessed it, fraud. Yet these things were perfectly legal and considered perfectly ethical. And this is the tip of the iceberg as far as fraud and deceit is concerned.

Dude, where's my country?
2008-08-25 14:51:00
Excellent Article
Bennet,

Once again, an excellent article. I especially liked the description of the "Deadman Walking Cycle".
2008-08-25 15:02:04
Great Article but I have too let you know Zions bankcorp may be an innocent man!

Yes they have exposure in Nevada and Arizona but their core is in a very solid Utah. The Bank has been very conservative and has a large number of LDS borrowers. The Mormons tend to accept reponsibility for their debts and although many construction firms are in serious trouble my experience has been that they are one community that truly strives to pay their debts. I do not own any stock in Zions but I did work for one of their subsidaries years ago and found them to be a very good company to work for. Any way just wanted to put my two cents in.

Great article thanks for the insight.
2008-08-25 15:03:53
Great Article again
WOW - what a prediction....Not treally a prediction but a excellent synopsis of what is happening with financial equities on wallstreet....

Thanks again for reminding me what seems to be unwinding as we speak.....

Can you go into more detail on you GNMA's that you are investing in...????? I am more interested in your game plan to protect your investors- if/when the hurricane hits....and the electric chair is buzzing away!

All the best,

Minyan Patrick
2008-08-25 15:14:19
Dude...
Your country has been Neo-Conned. While every administration has it's corrupt side, either Demo or Repub, this one has set the bar higher than anyone thought possible.

When fraud is practiced at the highest level, the followers will follow the leaders. It was clear way back in early 2001 that the "free market" was going to come back through hook or crook.

When all the pigs are being (well) feed, why would anyone complain? We all knew this was going on. No shock here. The problem is not that it happened but that the party ended so quickly, before everyone was ready.

Now the emotional/financial/spiritual hangover is coming on like a leveraged freight train.
2008-08-25 15:18:34
most interesting
Most interesting, to me, is the relatively extreme yields on GM and F paper. I do not see how those two situations work out, absent gov't involvement. Second most interesting to me, is the inclusion of some of the biggest life insurance names on the "sick" list. If you stipulate that nasty surprises come upon you from an unexpected direction, then I recommend keeping a wary eye on those two industry groups.
2008-08-25 17:15:07
most interesting
I wonder then since the life insurance companies are at risk then what does that say about annuities? Bennett would you address this?

JPM
2008-08-25 17:53:02
Liar Loans
I am curious why you put the entire blame on the borrower. If someone is offering liar loans, is not the one who offers these loans at least equally at fault, if not more so? Further, your description is just inaccurate. Most people who signed up for these loans did not understand them, and most were told that they could re-finance before the loans reset. They were told one lie after another. And is it not the lender's duty to properly underwrite the loan?

The truth is, the lender didn't care about the borrower, because he was "lending" only for a short period of time. After that, he would unload to toxic waste on some other sucker.

As a real estate agent, I can tell you that these corrupt deals continued--and continue today--long after everyone knew the problems. When the suckers stopped buying the CDO's or other exotic instruments, they just shoved in the GSE's and business went on as usual. I am closing a deal like that tomorrow (I do not represent the buyer) and have another on the table. I can pretty much promise you that the troubles will continue for a long time, because the industry continues to make the same bad loans. But don't you think the industry bears some fault?
2008-08-25 18:19:19
Did you happen to catch
the opening and closing ceremony of the Olympic games. Certainly a grandiose picture of ostentatious wealth. Well, alot of that used to be ours. Highly entertaining though...?
2008-08-25 18:25:30
Liar Loans
John:

I didn't make my point very well. I certainly didn't wish to put the blame for this mess entirely on borrowers at all. You and I see it much the same way. Lenders behaved egregiously, willfully and knowingly selling and trading sheer trash. Yet who could blame the loan officer whose managers were dangling trips to Hawaii in one hand and swinging the iron fist of revenue and share (profitable in the long run or not) with the other?

Similarly, who could blame borrowers teased with the prospect of a cash-out refi for the remodel of their dreams, with lower payments than before and a seemingly endless parade of increasing house values to inflate them out of their debt tomorrow?

Everybody involved in real estate over the past ten years lost their freaking minds - everybody. The interim result of the collective insanity was fraud perpetrated by parties on every side of so many transactions - whether they were buying, selling, or securitizing no-doc option ARMS or whatever else. The ultimate result is what we'll see over the next five years or so as much of that lousy debt is destroyed.

Yet I fear that what we won't see is a real accounting of what's gone on, nor will we see a genuine renunciation of fraud and a "resetting" of values to include the grounding notion that being honest in service of a slow buck is better than being a thieving, lying cheat in (lip)service to the shareholders... or to the god of granite countertops.

Sorry I didn't make my point better in my original post. We're all to blame for this mess, not just borrowers, not just lenders, not just traders, not just regulators... we're all in it together.
2008-08-25 19:16:48
Liar Loans
I think we are agreed, Jonathan. But I think we can go even further. There is a reason for all this corruption, one that goes beyond mere moral failure to the actual system itself. If people understood how money is really created and how banks really operate, there would be a revolution, at least one in thinking, if not an actually armed rebellion. But basically, the banks *must* keep churning out loans, and hoping for the best. Of course, they no longer have to merely hope, but can rest assured in gov't assurances to pick up the pieces after the inevitable collapse.
2008-08-25 23:23:24
Credit Crisis is spreading
Bennet,

Excelent article and as always I agree totally with all your comments, but I will like to hear from you how this credit crisis is spreading into other sectors, and how this crisis is not exclusive to the financial sector. I think this crisis is already hitting companies that are highly leverage, even if they aren't in the financial sector, an example of a company like this is the mexican cement company Cemex (CX). The amount debt of this comany has and the way they manage it was a simple matter of time to start seen it causing problems to the company, you can see it just by watching how the price of the stock has fall in a year.

I think that like CX there are many other companies in all sectors with a huge amout of debt that are starting to have problems with it.

Fil
2008-08-26 08:40:45
Utah and bankruptcy...
On the other hand, Utah tends to be in the top 10 in the nation in personal bankruptcy rates. (I haven't seen the latest figures but it has been for several years running.)

LDS followers are expected/taught to not be in debt. However, given the social nature of the religion there's apparently more than average pressure to keep up with the Joneses. I'm not sure I'd bet on Zions Bankcorp.
2008-08-26 11:32:11
Utah and bankruptcy...
That is interesting Amy. I was not aware of the personal bankruptcy issue. When I was there I saw a lot of very well managed personal portfolios and I was astonished at the number of wealthy individuals and how many of them lived very conservatively compared to their counterparts in California or Arizona. I haven't been their except to visit since the late 1990's when I lived in Salt Lake. The Church has a culture where wealth management is taught at a young age and the people pride themselves on ambition and hard work. If your correct and bankruptcy is high there maybe I was wrong. (it happens all the time)

Appeal denied Zions any last request for dinner?
2008-08-26 11:47:03
Utah Bankruptcy
This site:

http://www.bcsalliance.com/bankruptcy_statestats.html

Lists Utah as #4 in the nation with a rate of 620 of 100,000 while the national average is 380.

I have some knowledge of LDS doctrine and I wonder if the emphasis on tithing may play a role. An LDS member meets with their bishop annually and is asked point-blank if X dollars represents at least a tenth of their income; X being the number church records show was given. Taking 10% off the top in bad times would impact cash flow.
2008-08-26 12:41:56
John Magid....post of the decade! Couldn't agree more.
It is simple basic morality that is failing us combined with blind naked greed. The idea that someone has to lose (and lose big) for others to win economically in this country has become somewhat entrenched. I am hoping very much this trend can be reversed before Rome truly catches ablaze.

Once again, an excellent post that lays bare what we all really did learn in kindergarten...

cheers
2008-08-26 22:18:59
Utah Bankruptcy
Assuming that it is LDS followers are pushing up the bankruptcy rate, I think it's probably a combination of many factors that got them there. There's pressure to keep up with the Joneses (who *will* be visiting), tithing, and an emphasis on large, 1 income families. There's also a sense (or so I've been told) that the morally blessed are also/should be materially blessed.

Certainly ambition and hard work can overcome some of the difficulties I just named. However, if young families assume that their houses and lifestyles must look like those on TV and their parents and neighbors to be "acceptable", I can easily see how a high bankruptcy rate in Utah could happen.
2008-08-27 00:10:04
Fraud
As a lawyer with a lot of exposure to legal history, I can easily say that most fraud has always been legal, and that is a dirty secret of capitalism. Government intervention has always been necessary as a tool for reducing the ability to get away with it. The unregulated market in mortgage securities enabled this whole mess--a few fairly simple regulations by the appropriate governmental agency could have prevented the whole thing. That is to say, if those subprime bonds could not have been sold at prices not reflecting their value, very few bogus mortgages would have been made, because the maker would have had to keep them on their own books.

Of course, those with so much to lose (the ones assembling and selling these instruments) made sure that never happened. I think in fairness, those business organizations should be allowed to fail, even big ones like Citigroup, and the valuable remains turned over to those who bought the bonds in reliance on the representations about value and suffered losses from the fraud. Unfortunately, doing that would cost too much, because it would take too long to prove who knew or should have known the dangers of what they were buying and who did not. . . .
2008-08-27 09:31:54
Liar Loans
Well, let's not get into the Paulson mode. No, we not all "to blame". Certain individuals and companies committed acts, some of which are crimes for which we will all pay, but no, we are not all to blame.

When the well connected Elites fail, it is a great chance to "learn lessons"

When the lowly fail, it is time for " personal responsibility"
2008-08-27 12:23:19
Dean and Amy- I have one other theory on the high bankruptcy rates in Utah. The people of Utah have a very strong sense of independence my guess is with the support of the community and their families many people are willing to try and make it on their own. There is definetly an entrepeniurial spirit in Utah and my guess is more people attempt to succeed on their own and it results in a higher rate of failures. The people know they can count on their families to help them so they are not as afraid to venture off the safe path. My guess is also that a lot of these people succeed even after a failure or two.

Obiously the above is only an opinion I have no data to back it up I am just discussing this as an exercise not advocating anything.
2008-08-28 11:09:41
the recent rally in bank stocks is a lot like Ted Kennedys speech at the convention. Sure he looked great but we all know whats coming.
2009-11-23 03:04:46
fitch
People all over the world know the <a title="abercrombie and fitch" href="http://www.anfworld.com/" rel="dofollow"><strong>abercrombie and fitch</strong></a>,but not everyone really knows how fashion the abercrombie is,hollister is the Legend maker. Everybody wears the hollister clothing would be the abercrombie mensand the abercrombie womens, if you want know you can search the Ruehl No.925 or abercrombie outlet in the www.google.com .
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.