Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Minyan Mailbag: More About Mandatories


Clarifying tax considerations and accounting issues.


Prof. Succo,

The piece you wrote on converts and mandatories was fantastic: an extremely cogent overview of a complex (at least to the under-initiated) topic.

I was curious about a point that you allude to but explicitly put to the side for purposes of focusing on your core points: the accounting and tax considerations that drive the issuance of mandatories. I'd have thought a mandatory looks more like equity for tax than a convert so therefore wouldn't create a deduction. And for accounting I'm not sure, but perhaps you don't record interest expense since this would feel more like equity? But what about EPS? If it were considered equity wouldn't you get treasury stock accounting?

Anyway, I realize that we don't know each other and you are presumably busy with real work. But since your column suggested that you possess a pedagogic instinct--or certainly aptitude--I thought I would ask you for further clarification.

Kind regards,
Minyan Jeff


A mandatory is normally issued as a preferred stock with a par value as described in the article. For this type, from the company's standpoint, the coupon it pays is considered a dividend and is therefore not deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the preferred is considered equity and dilutive from the day it is issued.

But that wouldn't be what companies desire. Through legal opinions, the structure issued most these days, the ones used recently by Fannie Mae (FNM) and other financial companies, is called "mandatory units" and under this structure the dividends (coupon) is tax deductible and is considered debt on the day of issue, so the accounting treatment is non-dilutive. It is accounted for differently only at expiration or when the stock rises through the higher strike at which point it becomes dilutive.

- Prof. Succo

What are the pro traders saying about your stocks?
Minyanville's Buzz and Banter- 14 day FREE Trial

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos