Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Let's Risk 'Politicization' and Audit the Fed


While were at it, fine Bernanke every time he says they're trying to "ensure a strong dollar".

Editor's Note: The following was posted in real time on our premium Buzz & Banter (click for a free trial). It's being shared here for the benefit of the Minyanville community.

Greetings from New York, where wonks such as me are all slathered up over Rep. Ron Paul's proposal that the government be allowed to perform detailed audits of the Federal Reserve.

As I see it, the risk of an audit is politicizing an institution intentionally designed to minimize the impact of the political mood of the day.

As I see it metaphorically, concerns that the Federal Reserve be susceptible to politicizing is akin to being concerned that Sid Vicious's self-abuse and heroin addiction could shorten his life.

Sid's dead, as is the credibility of the statement, "The Fed is in every way removed from political influence."

I've got Ron Paul's back on this one in a big way. Audit 'em in a way that makes the Federal Reserve envious of the relatively muted scrutiny of Bernie Madoff. While we're at it, fine Ben Bernanke personally every time he assures us the Federal Reserve is seeking to "ensure a strong dollar".

1. No, the Federal Reserve isn't defending the dollar in any non-verbal manner.

2. Bernanke echoing our Cabinet Member Treasury of the Secretary about maintaining a "strong dollar" does nothing demonstrable except assure that an ever-sliding currency brings us right back to the credibility gap.

3. Taxpayers obviously deserve an accounting of where are money is being thrown away; particularly the "rich" who are going to bear the brunt of the tax increase (presumably as the cost has never been detailed).

Here's what I'm mulling when not howling in the general direction of Washington, D.C.:

  • All Hail the Purple Crayon! The generic-branded wand of wisdom got me long the GLD ETF on the break over 100. For what it's worth, the Crayon says to trim some longs now but stay long the bulk of the position unless, and until, GLD retreats below $110. No pride, just trading.

  • Speaking of which, I took some guff for thinking S&P 1,110 would be resistance. I may be right or wrong (my goal is only being the former slightly more than the latter), but the market weakening throughout the day will be mildly concerning if we close below 1,110. A close below 1,100 entirely would be a potentially positive day and a day which screamed "SELL".

  • New York Times (NYT) is one of the day's biggest winners. As my father used to say, "Even the mangiest dog has the sun shine on its arse if you wait long enough; doesn't mean you want to take it home with you". (NB: He didn't actually say "arse" and "mangiest" was often substituted in favor of a more vulgar term. Still, NYT getting back to $9 doesn't make it a buy).

  • Speaking of stocks to be considered for taking home and my dad, Target (TGT) has been smacked down about 5% since announcing it was "cautious" on the fourth quarter. From where I'm sitting, Target is going to do better than even it thinks. The stores are lean, clean, and working like a well-oiled retail machine. I'll be looking to buy the dip this week.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos