Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

The Fed Script

By

The Fed stayed within the standard framework ("Growth, Inflation, Guidance") but went beyond tilting the concern toward slowing growth. Way beyond.

PrintPRINT
Suffice it to say, I'm glad I didn't actually go golfing on Fed Day. It was a policy that generally worked during Greenspan's days of incrementalism, when we'd go 25-bips atta time in a largely consensus way. Yesterday wasn't about being incremental. It was about a new sheriff. It was about the Bernanke Fed announcing its presence with authority.

The Fed stayed within the standard framework ("Growth, Inflation, Guidance") but went beyond tilting the concern toward slowing growth. Way beyond. The Fed slammed on the gas pedal and all but totally disregarded the idea of braking for inflation. Paragraph #3 of the text (the guidance part, where the Fed scared the bulls last August), was all about growth. It was about a commitment to stimulus, only nodding towards "price stability" at the very end.

The Fed can't really take the word inflation entirely out of a statement but yesterday's release came about as close as possible. The Fed went hunting for Bear in the statement. The addition of a 50-bip cut in the discount window at the end was akin to mounting Boo's head on Ben's wall.


For more analysis on the Fed's rate cut, look at these titles: Red-Eye Randoms: Yesterday's Fed and What's Happening Now; On a Fed Day You Can See Forever; Righting the Economic Ship?


Will it "work"? In the big picture, probably not. In the short-term... well... the best explanation for the sell-off in stocks (meaning: the explanation requiring the fewest words) was seizing credit markets. Seizing credit markets are a function of lack of perceived liquidity.

Perception is only loosely correlated with reality but, at least for now, my perception is that the Fed under Chairman Ben is not going allow liquidity to be a problem. By bailing out Northern Rock, the UK is saying they are on the same page.

You can rage against the long term implications of this unified stance of money dumping but, from where I'm sitting, being short here seems like picking a fight with both the Fed and the tape. I'm inclined to take some profits, fret for the future and wait for lower prices to add more longs to my book but I'm not at all interested in shorting this tape.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE