ETF Showdown: Which MLP Is Master of the Universe?
Stellar performance, robust yields, and tax advantages make it impossible to ignore master limited partnerships.
In case you didn't already know, master limited partnerships (or MLPs) have been simply en fuego as an asset class in recent years. And what's not to like? Stellar performance, robust yields, and tax advantages make it impossible to ignore MLPs.
The rising popularity of MLPs has spawned another increase: More exchange-traded products offering exposure to the high-yielding stocks. For a while, the only game in town when it came to MLP ETFs wasn't an ETF at all, it was an ETN, as in the JPMorgan Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJ).
Well, the soaring popularity of MLPs has led to some competition for the JPMorgan Alerian MLP Index ETN, and we're going to take a look at two of those funds today: The ALPS Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and the Credit Suisse Cushing 30 MLP Index ETN (MLPN). Both ETFs have expense ratios of 0.85%, so we know that won't determine a winner here. We're going to have dig deeper.
Home to 25 stocks, the ALPS Alerian MLP ETF has a top-10 roster that reads like a who's who of the MLP universe. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), and Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP) are the ETF's top three holdings. Other top holdings include Oneok (OKS) and Williams Partners (WPZ).
MLPN is home to more stocks (30 to be precise), and no single holding receives a weight of over 3.45%. On the other hand, Kinder Morgan and Enterprise Products account for more than 19% of AMLP's weight by themselves.
So on the basis of diversity, the Credit Suisse offering look superior, and it looks like investors have taken note of that fact as the ETF has almost $224 million in assets under management and 20-day average volume of over 106,000 shares.
By those metrics, though, AMLP is the winner with over $1.7 billion in AUM and average volume of nearly 1.1 million.
Both ETFs are up about 1.2% year-to-date, but the performance edge would go to AMLP with a higher yield at 6.26% compared to 5.42% for MLPN.
On that basis, we'll declare AMLP the winner, but that being said, MLPN is a solid fund in its own right, especially when considering it's less than two years old and has already achieved a solid position in a competitive market niche.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
By Brett Callwood
Corporate Insiders are Turning Neutral on the U.S. Stock Market
By Nejat Seyhun
Keep up on economic news as it happens with Benzinga Pro – get your free trial here.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.