Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

S&P Still Likes Consumer Staples ETFs


In a new research note, S&P Capital IQ extols bullish views on select staples ETFs.


After a banner 2011 for consumer staples stocks and the corresponding ETFs, risk on has come back into style in 2012 and that has not been the best of news for the stodgy staples group. Still, it should be noted that the bigger names among staples ETFs are at least up on the year and are still within earshot of their 52-week highs.

In a new research note, S&P Capital IQ extols bullish views on select staples ETFs, placing Overweight ratings on four funds. That quartet is the Consumer Staples Select SPDR (XLP), the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC), the iShares Dow Jones US Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and the iShares S&P Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI).

As S&P notes, the staples group is a great way to dodge high beta names. "The relatively low historical volatility of Consumer Staples stocks is reflected in a 0.58 beta for the sector's S&P 500 shares, the lowest of any sector in the index," according to the note.

There are 19 staples ETFs in S&P coverage universe of 650 ETFs, but the four mentioned above are the only ones to receive the Overweight rating, S&P's highest.

Among XLP, VDC and IYK, investors will find ETFs that are heavy on the following familiar names: Procter & Gamble (PG), Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), Kraft (KFT), Wal-Mart (WMT) and CVS Caremark (CVS), to name a few.

KXI isn't vastly different as over 52% of that fund's weight is allocated to U.S.-based companies though the ETF does have one of the largest allocations to Nestle (NSRGY.PK), the world's biggest food company, of any ETF on the market.

S&P said in its note:

"Each of the four top-ranked Consumer Staples ETFs received an Overweight ranking in the Risk Considerations category. Each of these four ETFs had a positive assessment from S&P Quality Rank metric, which suggests a relatively good earnings and dividend track record for companies of which these ETFs owned shares. Among other risk-related analytics, all four of these give ETFs also had a favorable appraisal related to standard deviation, which measures price volatility of the ETF. Also, XLP and VDC had a relatively favorable S&P Credit Rating appraisal."

With State Street's (STT) recent announcement that it will lower fees for its Select Sector SPDRs suite, XLP now bests VDC as the cheapest staples ETF with an expense ratio of just 0.18%, but in S&P's coverage universe, XLP is not the largest staples ETF. That honor goes to the Marketweight-rated Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO), which had $6.2 billion in AUM as of February 7 compared to $5 billion for XLP, according to S&P.

Editor's Note: This content was originally published on by The ETF Professor.

Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:

How to Trade Bank of England's 50 Billion Pound Injection
By Daniel James Hayden IV

By The ETF Professor
By Michael Foster

Twitter: @Benzinga

Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here. Keep up on economic news as it happens with Benzinga Pro – get your free trial here.

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos