Two Norway-Specific ETFs Face Off
Though both ETFs can be viewed as developed market plays on rising oil prices and increased materials demand, there is a clear winner.
Considering it is the 25th largest economy in the world and considering that the iShares Sweden Index Fund (EWD) has been around since 1996, it took a while for Norway to get its own ETF. Until late 2010 in fact. That's when the Global X Norway ETF (NORW) debuted.
Well, it didn't take all that long for the Global X Norway ETF to get some competition. NORW's rival arrived earlier this week with the introduction of the iShares MSCI Norway Capped Investable Market Index Fund (ENOR), so there's no time like the present to see how the two Norway-specific ETFs stack up.
There have been times when Norway and NORW have provided headaches to investors. On the other hand, that might be by virtue of ignoring some cold hard facts, such as the fact that Norway is not a eurozone nation, Norway is a winner under the $100 oil scenario because it's an oil exporter, and that the country has an unemployment rate of south of 3.5%.
As is the case with many of my ETF showdowns, NORW and ENOR are similar, but they're not identical twins. Statoil (STO), Norway's largest oil company, is the top holding in both ETFs with a weight of almost 22% in NORW and nearly 21.1% in ENOR. Along those lines, ENOR has the higher weight to the energy sector at 52% compared to 39% for NORW.
The Global X offering is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.5% compared to 0.53% for ENOR. SeaDrill (SDRL), one of the strongest dividend plays in the oil services group, is included in both ETFs. However, it receives an allocation of almost 7.5% in ENOR compared to 5.7% in NORW.
That has led to talk ENOR could feature a decent yield. However, that impact maybe muted as Statoil features 3.7% yield and has a larger weight in NORW, yet NORW's yield is just 2.85% with both Statoil and SeaDrill accounting for over 27% of that ETF's weight.
ENOR holds 51 stocks, making it larger on that basis than NORW, which is home to 30 stocks. At the sector level, financials at almost 12.8% are the only group that receives a double-digit allocation in ENOR. On the other hand, NORW gives double-digit weights to financials, materials, telecom and consumer goods names in addition to energy.
Either way, both Norway ETFs can be viewed as developed market plays on rising oil prices and increased materials demand. That can translate to some volatility. Using NORW as our guide, that ETF was trading over $17 in May, found its way down to $12 by August before rebounding to $14 only to slide below $11 in October. After all that, NORW resides around $13.30, but the ETF is off to a sound start in 2012, adding 6.2% since the start of the year.
New ETFs should usually be given time to mature, but iShares has a dominant market position that allows many of its new funds to flourish right out of the gate. So those looking for Norway exposure don't need to ignore ENOR. That said, NORW's lower expense ratio and superior sector diversity make it the preferable choice and the winner of this showdown.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
Would Increased Job Training Lower Unemployment?
By Marco Rabinowitz
Will Illumina Be Bought Out?
By Abe Raymond
Three Times Is a Charm for Ford
By Brett Callwood
Keep up on economic news as it happens with Benzinga Pro – get your free trial here.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.