SPX Update: Do-or-Die Week for the Big Picture Wave Counts

By Jason Haver Feb 06, 2012 9:20 am

The rally has reached its next test at another important resistance zone.



On Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDU) came within six points of its 2011 high. If this high is broken, this would be an extremely significant event for the counts, since second waves cannot exceed the beginning of first waves. Monday is a critical day for the Minor Wave (2) count, and if the market doesn't reverse lower pretty much immediately, it will be time to rule that count out and consider some alternates.

I continue to favor the Minor (2) top here, but there is now no room for error. Since I've been wrong before, and Monday may be the bears' last chance for the Minor (2) count, I've looked at a number of alternate possibilities this weekend and have now decided on my main alternate long-term count.

The Minor (2) count isn't dead yet, and it's still my preferred count. But in the event that it's way off base and Monday opens higher, I'm going to present my main alternate count below for reference. This count considers the possibility that the 2011 decline was an (a) wave, and the current rally as part of a (b) wave.

On Friday, the S&P 500 (SPY) closed just below a significant overhead resistance zone, as did the INDU. The bears need this resistance zone to hold. If this zone can't turn back the rally, then it puts the 1,370s, and even the 1,400s in play.

This appears to be a critical pivot point for the market. My preferred view is that the market heads lower right from Monday's open and doesn't look back. However, if that doesn't happen, my main alternate count is shown below. This count will move into the preferred role if the INDU trades above 12,876.


Click to enlarge

If there's no pause at this resistance level, bears may want to stand aside and wait for the market to break its uptrend before taking further actions. I've said it many, many times before: Cash is a position, too.

There is really no need to fear "missing out," as I've also said before. If a big decline is still in the cards, it's not all going to all take place in one day. Certain posters on my blog have suggested a "flash crash" is around the corner. I've never been of this opinion. While anomalies are always possible, I see no signs of such an event in the current charts. Even the flash crash came after the market broke its uptrend line and started trending down -- not while it was still trending up. Sudden crashes almost never start from this type of market position. Patience is a virtue in trading.

In any case, as I mentioned at the beginning of this article, the Minor Wave (2) count isn't dead yet... it's just on severe life support. Below is the short-term SPX chart, which shows the preferred Minor (2) count. I will continue to favor this count unless the Dow makes new highs above 12,876.

Friday's preferred 1,343 target was hit nicely on the chart below -- in fact, the recent targets were originally suggested on January 24 as an if/then equation, which is often how the market functions. Those targets are still shown in the callout box, which has remained on the chart since the January 24.


Click to enlarge

The move can be cleanly counted as a complete five-wave rally, to complete c of (y) of Minor (2). Whether this is indeed the case will be revealed by the market directly.

If we combine the two charts above, we can see there are three major up-sloping trendlines that the bears need to break before we can have any confidence in a significant trend change. The first warning shot to bulls will be a break of the short-term channel shown above; the second and third will be breaks of the larger channels in the first chart. No trendline break equals no trend change. As I've also said previously, until such time as the market breaks down, the benefit of the doubt should go to the established trend.

My job, as I see it, is to project the potentials as best I can (including targets when possible), warn about the possibilities of a trend change when I see them, and suggest potential pivot zones so readers can be prepared. Potential trend change zones are areas to consider taking profits. If no reversal materializes, one can consider adding to positions if the market breaks through a resistance zone. Actively betting against a trend is tricky business, and traders must realize that.

Personally, I attempt quick stabs at countertrend positions and either make a few bucks, lose a few bucks, or get lucky with my best educated guess and nail the exact top or bottom. Less nimble intermediate-term swing traders should generally either wait for confirmation of a trend change, or be able to close positions without hesitation if they front-run a reversal that doesn't materialize, and critical support or resistance levels are violated.

For example, in my opinion, this is another very good zone to attempt some countertrend shorts, since the market is just below overhead resistance, and the risk/reward potential is good. But in order for the risk/reward equation to work, one has to be prepared to close positions if resistance is broken and the market doesn't reverse. If one is going to hold and hope forever, then the risk becomes astronomical, as the market could just keep right on rallying. Trading is all about managing risk, and betting against a trend is always risky.

As another example, due to a number of indicators, I was looking for a top back when the market was below 1,300-1,310. It's fine if you want to try and play that possible top, but once 1,300-1,310 was broken, and especially when it was back-tested and held as support, then it was time to look up, not down -- and the daily preferred count this week pointed to higher prices and targets the entire way up from that zone.

There are certainly lessons here for those traders who have front-run a top without using stops.

Anyway, back to the market. There are signs that momentum actually increased on Friday. For the short term, the bears’ primary hope is that Friday was an exhaustion gap similar to October 27 -- and this is indeed a possibility. As is so often the case in the market, we simply won't have an answer to that question until the next session.

< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • All the News and Insights You Need Right in Your Inbox | Sign Up for Our Free Newsletter

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS