The Buying Stampede: Like Lemmings Over a Cliff?

By Mr Practical May 01, 2009 9:35 am
Money coming into market isn't picking stocks on fundamentals - it just wants to be in stocks.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+
My friend John told me something arcane, hard to interpret, but perhaps meaningful.

Index option prices have come way down. He measures it by “implied volatility.” For example, with an SPX index option trading at a certain price, his model might say that the price implies at 30 volatility. This means the option price is implying that the index will move up or down 30% over the next year.

Now, an index option price is driven by 2 things: The volatility of all the underlying stocks and the correlation between those stocks. The first part is intuitive; the second is not.

Let’s pretend an index has only 2 stocks in it: A and B. If A goes up and B goes down, they cancel each other out, and the index is unchanged. But if A and B go down together, the index moves a lot. So when the correlation is low between stocks, the index volatility tends to be low; when the correlation between stocks increases, the volatility of the index rises.

Based on the option prices of the underlying stocks as compared to the option price of the index, his model can measure the implied correlation between stocks.

He tells me statistically something is happening the degree of which is very rare. Even though the option prices and the implied volatility of the stocks has dropped a lot, the implied correlation has remained near all-time highs.

After saying “so what,” he finally got to the punch line. This means that -- to a very great degree -- the money coming into the market (as it rises) is almost all coming in through equity index futures.

Even I know what that means: The money coming into the market isn't picking stocks on fundamentals, etc. It just wants to be in stocks.

You can make your own conclusions on that one.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


(16)
2009-05-01 06:38:10
so many 90% days
That's the way to use the ol' noggin! Fine analysis of the underlying to arrive at the macro hidden in plain sight. Can this explain why we've had SO many 90% days (both up and down) in the last two months?

It was suggested last Sept. that the gubmint could affect the markets far more efficiently by judicious play with equity futures than with TARP or CR@P or the rest. Perhaps the PPT (or at least TurboTim) is quietly listening.
2009-05-01 06:39:17
so many 90% days
MV really needs to look at their "posted at" clock, it works like Merlin aged.
2009-05-01 09:42:51
Stab
Let me take a wild crazy whinning stab.

Index etf purchases are chasing the market around. I'm not an expert, but the Qs and SPY seem to be leading other stocks. Then the individual stocks change course.

Conclusion: There is some degree of manipulation of the index etfs. Now not knowing who is doing that myself, I wonder who's agenda wants the market appear to be improving? Real leap of faith.

Who wants to increase the money supply? Mish is right that there never is any sidline money coming into the market, except in IPOs. Unless, you actually control the money supply.

What a game of chicken. You have to appreciate seeing history unfold; either way. Nothing personal.
2009-05-01 09:43:22
Great analysis
Thank you for this great analysis. I never knew index options prices were a function of implied future correlation, but it makes total sense. Anyone who is long equities right now is asking to get hit by a haymaker just like the one that hit them last October.
2009-05-01 09:45:57
Holy Cr@p
Well... there you have it. I've been reading that a significant portion of the recent rally has been driven by overnight gaps upward that occurred on light volume, only to be followed by lackluster intra-day performance that has failed to match the magnitude of the corresponding overnight performance. TPTB, at work again.
2009-05-01 10:41:27
Interesting Times
I relate to Brandon's comment about feeling some appreciation for seeing history unfold in this surreal environment. (Sort of like the Houston area experiencing three ONE HUNDRED YEAR floods since the early nineties.) My takeaway is that anyone trying to read the tea leaves based on historical models/patterns is (even more so) engaging in mental mastrubation at best and putting their capital at extreme risk if they take a long term position. I believe Kevin discribed it as picking up dimes in front of a bulldozer earlier in the year. DRH
2009-05-01 12:34:48
Catch the wave
The psychological need to get back to even, then bailout, is at work here. Traders know when to jump in and out, the retail investor, with that terrible nagging desire to get back to GO, will be bull dozed once again. I still know 401k'ers who haven't sold anything, yet are 55 and up in years. The bobble heads keep up the buy and hold stuff, encouraging them to catch the big wave now building, hurry up to get back to even, and then on to higher and higher glory. Stupid investors are still human and are still suffering. The 401K will prove to have been a very bad idea for Ma and Pa types, and their lack of spending power will come back to haunt some very powerful Masters of the Universe. Just thinking ahead a few years. cdk
2009-05-01 12:40:56
Every time I hear the death knell of the buy and hold strategy I am heartened. Tbqh, I am not as bright as the rest of the people on here... I certainly do not pretend to be able to time or predict the market. Markets go up and down but true diversification and a healthy respect for the right asset allocation for your time horizon still makes sense to me.

The 401k may be the best gift ever to Ma & Pa types who would never have saved otherwise.
2009-05-01 13:11:03
Quiet & Deadly
It's the energy efficient "Prius Deflationary Freight Train" coming our way. You can't hear it, fail to look before jumping back in and then get run over. Caveat emptor now! Shorting the long bond to have a seat on this freight line. Full speed ahead.
2009-05-01 13:35:59
quiet but deadly
is now a taxable item in Europe due to its "greenhouse gas" status

moo
2009-05-02 12:28:19
Lemmingade
Or what to make when handed Lemmings.

Unlike Al Capp's Shmoos (for those old enough to remember the critters that would gladly jump into a pot and boil themselves to feed a hungry person), Lemmings have less intelligence but may well end up feeding those who do.

Instincts serve most herding animals better than the Lemmings, but rational behavior is supposed to be the defining characteristic of humans.

Rationalization rather than being rational has come into vogue. Mr. Practical's followers will likely draw the right conclusions.

How do you prefer your Lemmingade -- one lump or two?
2009-05-02 12:37:58
quiet but deadly
Well the Woolly Mammoths actually liked the earth when it was a greenhouse but they can't vote nowadays. Growing crops in the Arctic Circle, Greenland, and northern Canada would feed a lot of people. The downside is that New Orleans would be under water full instead of part-time... perhaps a good trade?
2009-05-02 21:16:58
quiet but deadly
More correctly, MOST of New Orleans would be underwater full- instead of part-time - but the French Quarter (the Old City) was built on the only solid higher ground around, and would remain dry. Well, wet, really, very wet (drink-wise) and fun :))

Yep, GREAT trade, where can I buy futures?
2009-05-02 21:20:09
quiet but deadly
And don't forget farming, mining and drilling for oil in Antarctica, once a tropical paradise and just loaded (maybe, probably) with exotic dinosaur bones and extra greenhouse goodies. Whee!
2009-05-03 10:20:28
quiet but deadly
As I recall the Ice Age lowered the sea level by 600 feet and we are still down 200 feet. I'll have to check the highest elevation in NO but I doubt it is that high. In any case, it isn't very hard to move a party given a few hundred or thousand years.

The govt is deadly but not quiet. Silence is indeed golden.
2009-05-03 10:25:37
quiet but deadly
The Sahara desert was the Sahara forest back when the world was a greenhouse. Global warming cools some areas because there is better heat distribution after the ice caps melt.

The first ice age was about 100 million years ago so there is definitely long-term cooling at work. Given a choice between woolly Mammoths and Polar bears, I vote for the Woollys....never saw a circus with a Polar bear.
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.