Obama's Massive Tax Cuts

By Andrew Jeffery Jan 05, 2009 1:15 pm
Rebates and infrastructure cornerstones of plan.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+
As Inauguration day nears, details of President-Elect Barack Obama’s huge economic stimulus package are emerging. In today's meeting with Congressional Democrats, Obama begins to lay out his vision for reviving the nation’s catatonic economy.

According to the Wall Street Journal, around 40% of what could be an almost $800 billion plan may come in the form of tax cuts. Rather than mailing rebate checks, as the Bush administration did last summer -- which by most accounts did little to boost real economic activity -- Obama wants to reduce tax withholdings to get more cash into the hands of middle-class workers with every paycheck.

The plan also calls for the widening of so-called “tax look-backs,” which allow companies to apply today's losses to future tax bills. The new proposal would let firms book losses against past tax payments, freeing up money for the current tax period.

To encourage businesses to buy new machines, factories and make other capital investments, Obama is considering allowing newly purchased assets to be more quickly depreciated. Along with tax breaks for hiring new workers and delaying layoffs, the new administration wants to discourage downsizing and prevent firms from delaying expansion plans. 

These and other tax-specific initiatives would come on top of previously announced plans for heavy infrastructure investment. When news of the impending stimulus package began to trickle out toward the end of 2008, peddlers of all things metallic enjoyed a strong bounce into year-end.

Freeport McMoRan (FCX), the world's second-largest copper producer, is up almost 100% from its December lows, Nucor (NUE), America's largest steelmaker has bounced more than 90% since November and US Steel (X) is approaching levels not seen since last October. Still, these and other commodity-centric firms are well off highs seen just last summer.

Ultimately, dollars earmarked for businesses and consumers alike are being sent out with a single mission: To be spent. With consumer and business spending making up almost 85% of gross domestic product, it’s no wonder politicians are urging Americans to part with their precious pennies for the greater good.

As the sage Mr. Practical reminded us this morning, however, the true path to economic recovery is through saving, not spending. With each dollar the Federal Reserve prints to finance this massive deficit-spending program, our paychecks -- though they may be increasing in size -- are worth less every month.

Economic stimulus is all well and good, but handing out a currency that’s constantly being debased is akin to tires spinning in the mud: With each rotation, they just bury themselves deeper, and the task of unburying gets longer, more difficult, and infinitely dirtier.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



(3)
2009-02-27 13:08:31
These aren't tax "cuts"
It's just different tax withholdings.. The obama administration is withholding more of our money, to make interest on it, but we still have to pay the same amount of taxes. Maybe there are some "credits'? But this has nothing to do with tax cuts!

At least, that is what I am hearing now. Can someone please clear this up? If it's true, then the title of this article is deeply misleading and should be changed.

Thanks,
-e
2009-02-27 13:48:48
These aren't tax "cuts"
The article is too vague, much like the proposals we hear. Reducing tax withholdings? The amount of tax "withheld" is supposed to be what you are expected to have to pay. You reduce income taxes or you do not. Accelerated depreciation is "write it off quicker, pay the tax later."
Some of the other proposals have the potential of helping a little, but I see no Massive Tax Cuts here.
The reality for small business is not talked about. When they say an individual "makes" more than $250.000.00, if he/she is in business, this is gross revenues, not what is "made", what is grossed. If I charge a consulting fee and earn this money (250K), no big deal. If I buy and sell, pay for maintenance, property taxes, labor, etc., then it is a BIG deal. My PERSONAL income could be $25,000.00 with a $25,000.00 tax bill. The pundits may say some people were unfairly affected, but overall,.......blah, blah, blah.
2009-02-27 14:40:29
These aren't tax "cuts"
Oh wait. I said that the wrong way. I hadn't had my morning coffee yet. They're withholding less because it's a tax credit, but we'll just have to pay a portion of it back next year since that extra money in our paychecks is counting as income. But it is absolutely NOT a tax cut. (but I'm sure you knew what I meant ;). I understand that the media is going to print misleading things. That goes without saying. But how can Obama and his administration get away with using the term "tax cuts" when it is NOT a tax cut?

Is that really true about the 250 being a "gross revenues"? That is ridiculous. wow..

Here, this may be fun to watch: tinyurl.com/obamaprotest09
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.