Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

How to Tell If You're a Deflationist or Inflationist

By

These three considerations are the hinges of the debate.

PrintPRINT

A heated debate currently involves whether we'll experience inflation or deflation down the road.

This debate is of high interest to market participants because conditions of inflation or deflation require different, perhaps diametrically opposed positioning (for example buying General Electric (GE) versus selling it) in order to effectively navigate the situation from a financial standpoint.

This debate finds some very sharp cookies on opposite sides of the fence. A great number of intelligent thinkers are steadfast in their belief that inflation of a great magnitude is pending, while another large group strongly believes that deflation awaits.

How can so many smart people with very respectable thought processes be so diametrically opposed?

One reason relates to differences in the definition of inflation and deflation. Some people define inflation/deflation in popular terms of price while others select a definition grounded in classic terms of money supply. Changes in money supply don't necessarily influence prices of all categories (i.e. goods, services, stocks, real estate, etc.) in the same manner. Thus, grounding an argument in a price-based definition of inflation or deflation may not be comparable to an argument grounded in a money-supply-based definition.

Differences in time horizon may also be cause for separation. Some folks see only inflation or deflation for the foreseeable future. Others, however, view the future in phases. Some die-hard inflationists envision a near-term period of deflation before inflation really kicks in. Similarly, some in the deflation camp see a near-term inflationary burst higher before lights out deflation.

That being said, a great many individuals who possess similar conceptual definitions and time horizons still operate at different ends of the inflation/deflation spectrum. In studying the many arguments on both sides of this debate, I've concluded that differences of opinion seem to hinge on at least three underlying issues:

1. Paper money vs. credit money.

Inflationists assume fiat money systems permit governments to literally "print" money at will. Because bureaucrats have a "printing press" at their disposal, they'll indeed print money in an attempt to bail the system out during difficult periods.

Deflationists argue that expansion of supply in modern monetary systems doesn't depend on money printing in the literal sense, but rather on the creation of credit. The dynamic of credit money creation is different from paper money in that it ultimately depends not on the government's willingness to provide a large credit supply, but on credit demand. If demand for credit is low, then money supply may not rapidly expand.

2. Limits on money creation.

Inflationists believe that, lacking the political will to do otherwise, bureaucrats will always resort to printing more money during difficult times. A landscape covered in dollar confetti is the logical outcome.

Deflationists argue that there's a limit to how much credit money can be created. More credit means more debt and increased risk. Creditors (in our particular case other countries such as China) will raise the cost of borrowing to offset risk. Facing the specter of higher interest rates, bureaucrats will be forced to let the system deleverage.

3. Monetary vs. social phenomenon.

Inflationists generally concur with economist Milton Friedman, who once stated that inflation is ultimately a monetary phenomenon. Essentially, inflation is a function of the printing press and those who control supply.

Deflationists believe that inflation is ultimately a social phenomenon. Inflation depends on credit creation, which depends on willingness to borrow, which depends on an appetite for risk. Appetite for risk is a social, not financial, variable. Should collective risk appetite for risk be low, then those wishing to inflate the system are "pushing on a string." Essentially, inflation (and deflation) is a function of those who control demand rather than supply.

How the above issues are viewed likely influences allegiance to either the inflation or deflation camp.


No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE