Market Manipulation Under Veil of Secrecy?
By
Mr Practical
Apr 03, 2008 10:25 am
Intervention knows no bounds.
Every time people ask “What's the government going to do about this?” I'm sure Thomas Jefferson rolls over in his grave.
We can see many ways in which the government is taking control of markets. People seem relieved in the short run, but in the long run consistent intervention is very damaging to free markets. We've seen socialism at work in other countries and the result is consistently mis-allocation of capital and low productivity. It also provides no protection from corruption.
But there may also be ways they're intervening in markets that we don’t see. My trader friend John watches the “tape” very closely and tells me the phenomenon of well-bid index futures and heavy stocks continues. We know Middle Eastern investors are recycling oil dollars back into U.S. assets - at least for now. They may be simply buying futures for asset allocation, but John tells me its much more than that.
For example, Tuesday morning in Europe when UBS (UBS) announced it would write down $19 billion and Deutsche Bank (DB) made similar pronouncements, both stocks were down big and the market was indicated much lower. That was the same day Lehman Brothers (LEH) was supposed to sell $3 billion in preferred stock to raise much needed capital. Imagine Lehman trying to get that deal done in such a messy tape.
Then all of a sudden those stocks began to turn. Along with the market, they closed higher on the day. Futures steadily rose all morning and methodically ended at the highs of the day. U.S. stocks saw one of the biggest rallies of the year. LEH not only got its deal done, but the stock rose so much the firm decided to grant another $1 billion in stock to its most loyal and secret investors.
It's all highly convenient things turned out this way. The markets went from potential disaster based on fundamentals to a rip-roaring rally just when the government and banks needed it. It's also highly suspicious.
Wall-Streeters and the media have called those who claim the government intervenes in the stock market ridiculous. They'd better. If it were ever found out that Washington does intervene in the market, all remaining confidence in the integrity of markets would be lost.
But the pundits don't do a very good job of debunking all the ancillary evidence of such intervention. Their main argument is that there's no way to hide stock market buying by the government. That argument is very flimsy; there are many ways to hide it.
How about all these “loans” the Federal Reserve is making to dealers. There could easily be an arrangement that looks like a simple loan but in fact indemnifies the dealer from losses on any assets purchased with the proceeds of the loan. Just look at the deal the Fed made with JPMorgan (JPM) in buying Bear Stearns (BSC).
The Fed said it was taking control of $30 billion of a BSC portfolio, but not buying those assets, as currently the 1913 Federal Reserve act doesn't permit such an action. However, the Fed is the the residual claimant, so it's apparent it effectively has equity even if it won't admit it. Overall, the Fed appears to be using any legal or structural manifestations necessary to accomplish what it wants to do despite what the Federal Reserve Act actually permits it to do.
These are strange times indeed. Ron Paul did a good job of explaining it all in yesterday's hearing. I just wish Mr. Paul would ask a few direct questions of Mr. Bernanke like "does any aspect of the Federal government intervene directly or indirectly in the stock market," to get him on the record.
If the stock market doesn’t act quite naturally to you, there may be good reason for it. But the important point is that free markets are going away, bit by bit. Be prepared for a much different world if that continues. And don't think your vote is going to protect it because people who are in debt with no where to turn aren't going to vote with you.
We can see many ways in which the government is taking control of markets. People seem relieved in the short run, but in the long run consistent intervention is very damaging to free markets. We've seen socialism at work in other countries and the result is consistently mis-allocation of capital and low productivity. It also provides no protection from corruption.
But there may also be ways they're intervening in markets that we don’t see. My trader friend John watches the “tape” very closely and tells me the phenomenon of well-bid index futures and heavy stocks continues. We know Middle Eastern investors are recycling oil dollars back into U.S. assets - at least for now. They may be simply buying futures for asset allocation, but John tells me its much more than that.
For example, Tuesday morning in Europe when UBS (UBS) announced it would write down $19 billion and Deutsche Bank (DB) made similar pronouncements, both stocks were down big and the market was indicated much lower. That was the same day Lehman Brothers (LEH) was supposed to sell $3 billion in preferred stock to raise much needed capital. Imagine Lehman trying to get that deal done in such a messy tape.
Then all of a sudden those stocks began to turn. Along with the market, they closed higher on the day. Futures steadily rose all morning and methodically ended at the highs of the day. U.S. stocks saw one of the biggest rallies of the year. LEH not only got its deal done, but the stock rose so much the firm decided to grant another $1 billion in stock to its most loyal and secret investors.
It's all highly convenient things turned out this way. The markets went from potential disaster based on fundamentals to a rip-roaring rally just when the government and banks needed it. It's also highly suspicious.
Wall-Streeters and the media have called those who claim the government intervenes in the stock market ridiculous. They'd better. If it were ever found out that Washington does intervene in the market, all remaining confidence in the integrity of markets would be lost.
But the pundits don't do a very good job of debunking all the ancillary evidence of such intervention. Their main argument is that there's no way to hide stock market buying by the government. That argument is very flimsy; there are many ways to hide it.
How about all these “loans” the Federal Reserve is making to dealers. There could easily be an arrangement that looks like a simple loan but in fact indemnifies the dealer from losses on any assets purchased with the proceeds of the loan. Just look at the deal the Fed made with JPMorgan (JPM) in buying Bear Stearns (BSC).
The Fed said it was taking control of $30 billion of a BSC portfolio, but not buying those assets, as currently the 1913 Federal Reserve act doesn't permit such an action. However, the Fed is the the residual claimant, so it's apparent it effectively has equity even if it won't admit it. Overall, the Fed appears to be using any legal or structural manifestations necessary to accomplish what it wants to do despite what the Federal Reserve Act actually permits it to do.
These are strange times indeed. Ron Paul did a good job of explaining it all in yesterday's hearing. I just wish Mr. Paul would ask a few direct questions of Mr. Bernanke like "does any aspect of the Federal government intervene directly or indirectly in the stock market," to get him on the record.
If the stock market doesn’t act quite naturally to you, there may be good reason for it. But the important point is that free markets are going away, bit by bit. Be prepared for a much different world if that continues. And don't think your vote is going to protect it because people who are in debt with no where to turn aren't going to vote with you.

No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



(9)
Reply
2008-04-03 10:51:41
A credible Alternative to the "All the Bad/Worst News Must be Out Now" Explanation
But a more scary one for sure!
Mr P. is usually right, so the market may now be a lot more tricky than just dealing with Government influences -- direct intervention, as well. Cash and short positions are obviously not the best bets - cash in other currencies/countries is probably safer.
Mr P. is usually right, so the market may now be a lot more tricky than just dealing with Government influences -- direct intervention, as well. Cash and short positions are obviously not the best bets - cash in other currencies/countries is probably safer.
2008-04-03 11:10:49
Manipulation
I agree with you completely. I have traded the market for many many years and I have never seen such incredible movements.
To see the futures yesterday move higher as Benanke was giving his views about the grim outlook for the economy was mind blowing.
Last year they said 'well contained', I suppose it must be reverse logic now and they believe the opposite to be true of his words!
To see the futures yesterday move higher as Benanke was giving his views about the grim outlook for the economy was mind blowing.
Last year they said 'well contained', I suppose it must be reverse logic now and they believe the opposite to be true of his words!
2008-04-03 11:18:45
smoking gun
One way to detect possible illegal coordinated attempts to prop up equity markets might be to compare action among various brokers. If the buy orders of independents, possibly Ameritrade or Scotttrade, did not mirror those of the primary brokers during those episodes of suspicious activity, you might have a smoking gun.
2008-04-03 11:43:52
From The Movie "Moonstruck"
Cosmo Castorini: A man understands one day that his life is built on nothing, and that's a bad, crazy day.
2008-04-03 11:46:35
The growing number
of people that detect a sense of new paradigm are all scratching their tin-foil hat after being dismissed or marginalized. We have drifted, how far and for how long is skewed and not identifiable. Bicamerlism or the fundamental decree of the constitutional which provides a process of checks, balances, over site, and separation of powers was all but extinguished. From that decaying process we the people find ourself in the midst of the many resulting calamities. Add to the muddle-stew an election year and we now have politicians falling all over each other to heal each festering canker. In the economies instance, what is not known is just how far they will go under the cloak of free market capitalism.
If watching the situation very carefully doesn't work then call upon the unassuming tax-payers. Next just change the rules and principles, disregard the very things that got us to this point. If recent history reruns, distort, evade, spin, hush, cover-up, complicity and manipulation will all be part of the functioning contemporary processes. You may contend time frame based on Mr Practical's words -the Fed is using any legal or structural manifestations necessary to accomplish what it wants- to those that watch closely, appreciate that Mr P's intuitive insight and honesty has been straight up appropriate. Consistent intervention will have its toll. Thanking you Mr. Practical, I get to put the tin-foil cap on the rack this ayem.
If watching the situation very carefully doesn't work then call upon the unassuming tax-payers. Next just change the rules and principles, disregard the very things that got us to this point. If recent history reruns, distort, evade, spin, hush, cover-up, complicity and manipulation will all be part of the functioning contemporary processes. You may contend time frame based on Mr Practical's words -the Fed is using any legal or structural manifestations necessary to accomplish what it wants- to those that watch closely, appreciate that Mr P's intuitive insight and honesty has been straight up appropriate. Consistent intervention will have its toll. Thanking you Mr. Practical, I get to put the tin-foil cap on the rack this ayem.
2008-04-03 12:44:11
manipulation and a stunning admission
I spent ten years on trading floor and always felt it was not a fruitful mindset to suspect manipulation. But the markets movements do feel very "un-natural" .
The stunning admission is that in trying to justify the Bear Sterns handover, Bernanke and Paulson have just admitted that the financial system is just one bank failure away from total collapse.
For once, they got it right.
The stunning admission is that in trying to justify the Bear Sterns handover, Bernanke and Paulson have just admitted that the financial system is just one bank failure away from total collapse.
For once, they got it right.
2008-04-03 17:47:44
The invisible hand behind the non-existent emperor pants.
R Paul doesn't seem to directly ask the tough questions to any members of the "Working Group of Financial Markets". My guess is it is a defensive political maneuver. Hard to find a smoking gun but I think some dealers are playing along the game like Mr. Practical said possibly getting some side "tips". Some of the currency moves, specifically the dollar not falling the weekend of the Bear fallout, may have been done legally through Hank's Exchange Stabilization Fund. Gold dropping was definitely an orchestrated move.
Nice post David
Nice post David
2008-04-03 20:10:29
How they did it in Scandinavia.
Interesting how many templates exist for doing it. This looks well done
Fed eyes Nordic-style nationalisation of US banks
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor
02/04/2008
The Fed has been criticised for its rescue of Bear Stearns, which critics say
has degenerated into a taxpayer gift to rich bankers.
A senior official at one of the Scandinavian central banks told The Daily
Telegraph that Fed strategists had stepped up contacts to learn how Norway,
Sweden and Finland managed their traumatic crisis from 1991 to 1993, which
brought the region's economy to its knees. It is understood that Fed
vice-chairman Don Kohn remains very concerned by the depth of the US crisis and
is eyeing the Nordic approach for contingency options.
Scandinavia's bank rescue proved successful and is now a model for central
bankers, unlike Japan's drawn-out response, where ailing banks were propped up
in a half-public limbo for years.
While the responses varied in each Nordic country, there a was major
effort to avoid the sort of "moral hazard" that has bedevilled efforts by
the Fed and the Bank of England in trying to stabilise their banking systems.
Norway ensured that shareholders of insolvent lenders received nothing and
the senior management was entirely purged. Two of the country's top four banks -
Christiania Bank and Fokus - were seized by force majeure.
"We were determined not to get caught in the game we've seen with Bear
Stearns where shareholders make money out of the rescue," said one Norwegian
adviser. "The law was amended so that we could take 100pc control of any bank
where its equity had fallen below zero. Shareholders were left with nothing. It
was very controversial," he said. Stefan Ingves, governor of Sweden's
Riksbank, said his country passed an act so it could seize banks where the
capital adequacy ratio had fallen below 2pc. Efforts were also made to protect
against "blackmail" by shareholders.
Mr Ingves said there were parallels with the US crisis, citing the use of
off-balance sheet vehicles to speculate on property. All the Nordic banks were
nursed back to health and refloated or merged. The tough policies contrast with the bail-out of Bear Stearns, where shareholders forced JP Morgan to increase its Fed-led rescue offer from $2to $10 a share. Christopher Wood, chief strategist at brokers CLSA,says the Fed's piecemeal approach has led to "appalling moral hazard". "Shareholders have been able to lobby for a higher share price only because the Fed took over the credit risk on $30bn of the investment bank's dubious paper. The whole affair also amounts to a colossal subsidy for JP Morgan," he said.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/business/ambrosevanspritchard/#post_279436
Fed eyes Nordic-style nationalisation of US banks
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor
02/04/2008
The Fed has been criticised for its rescue of Bear Stearns, which critics say
has degenerated into a taxpayer gift to rich bankers.
A senior official at one of the Scandinavian central banks told The Daily
Telegraph that Fed strategists had stepped up contacts to learn how Norway,
Sweden and Finland managed their traumatic crisis from 1991 to 1993, which
brought the region's economy to its knees. It is understood that Fed
vice-chairman Don Kohn remains very concerned by the depth of the US crisis and
is eyeing the Nordic approach for contingency options.
Scandinavia's bank rescue proved successful and is now a model for central
bankers, unlike Japan's drawn-out response, where ailing banks were propped up
in a half-public limbo for years.
While the responses varied in each Nordic country, there a was major
effort to avoid the sort of "moral hazard" that has bedevilled efforts by
the Fed and the Bank of England in trying to stabilise their banking systems.
Norway ensured that shareholders of insolvent lenders received nothing and
the senior management was entirely purged. Two of the country's top four banks -
Christiania Bank and Fokus - were seized by force majeure.
"We were determined not to get caught in the game we've seen with Bear
Stearns where shareholders make money out of the rescue," said one Norwegian
adviser. "The law was amended so that we could take 100pc control of any bank
where its equity had fallen below zero. Shareholders were left with nothing. It
was very controversial," he said. Stefan Ingves, governor of Sweden's
Riksbank, said his country passed an act so it could seize banks where the
capital adequacy ratio had fallen below 2pc. Efforts were also made to protect
against "blackmail" by shareholders.
Mr Ingves said there were parallels with the US crisis, citing the use of
off-balance sheet vehicles to speculate on property. All the Nordic banks were
nursed back to health and refloated or merged. The tough policies contrast with the bail-out of Bear Stearns, where shareholders forced JP Morgan to increase its Fed-led rescue offer from $2to $10 a share. Christopher Wood, chief strategist at brokers CLSA,says the Fed's piecemeal approach has led to "appalling moral hazard". "Shareholders have been able to lobby for a higher share price only because the Fed took over the credit risk on $30bn of the investment bank's dubious paper. The whole affair also amounts to a colossal subsidy for JP Morgan," he said.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/business/ambrosevanspritchard/#post_279436
2008-04-03 21:30:27
Manipulation
SP500 futures volume has been strangely high on rising price before the exchange opens several days recently. This morning and also April 1.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved





















