Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

"Derivative" Is Not a Dirty Word

By

Two things most people consider beneficial are essentially these types of products.

PrintPRINT
As I sit here trying to find value in the convertible-bond market for my clients (it's there, but it's a lot more challenging to find than it was a year ago), I'm struck by a couple of the pieces of information overload I'm taking in.

One is a commentary I was just watching on Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD) on one of the financial networks. Now, I usually keep the sound off (I share an office with someone who spends most of his day talking to customers), so I had to kind of guess what the point of the TV segment was.

And then I remembered a discussion I had with my students in a derivatives course I taught 10 years ago at Yale. The point of the course, to me, was to help students who might be going into public policy gain an understanding of what derivatives are really all about. They've been sporting a scarlet "D" for years, if not decades, in the financial press. In fact, if you're not careful, you might think the term "derivatives" has had the epithet "toxic" legally and surgically attached.

I titled the discussion in the Yale course "Insurance and Chicken Parts." The point was to show that two things most people generally regard as socially beneficial are essentially derivative products.

Insurance, after all, only pays off based on what happens to some underlying asset. In other words, it's a derivative.

Chicken parts are a bit different. But the process of slicing and dicing -- so maligned these days in the world of mortgage-backed securities -- is essential to the production and selling of chicken parts. Otherwise, no matter what part you want, you'd have to buy the whole chicken. Similarly, no matter what your view on a company or market, you'd have to buy only the most basic of securities without derivatives.

Now, derivatives get problematic when you start using leverage to buy them, need to sell them at any given point, and rely on constant, perfect market functioning. But the concept still makes sense.

I just thought it was a good time for a reminder.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE