Congress to Homeowners: Destroy Retirement to Avoid Foreclosure

By Andrew Jeffery Oct 06, 2011 8:30 am

Congress is proposing yet another ill-conceived plan to slow foreclosures. The latest scheme is not simply misguided, but could be downright ruinous for American families.



Our elected officials want to play financial adviser to distressed homeowners -- and dole out terrible advice.

In their infinite wisdom, Congress is proposing yet another ill-conceived plan to slow foreclosures. The latest scheme is not simply misguided, but could be downright ruinous for American families.

Two Republican Senators from Georgia, Johnny Isakson and Tom Graves, introduced a bill to Congress that would give borrowers the green light to withdraw retirement money, penalty free, to make mortgage payments. According to HousingWire, borrowers could withdraw up to $50,000 or half their account value (whichever was smaller), from qualified retirement accounts without incurring the 10% penalty for early withdrawal.

In defending his plan, Isakson argued "This bill will help Americans who risk foreclosure use their own resources to make their mortgage payment on time without being penalized by the federal government." Isakson neglected to add that families heeding his advice would likely not only lose their home, but lose half their retirement nest egg in the process. A lose-lose, if you will.

What is so very wrong about the concept that plundering your retirement account to save your house is a good idea, is that if a borrower has to dip into retirement money to make mortgage payments, he or she should not be making those mortgage payments in the first place. It is the definition of throwing good money after bad.

Congress has this very altruistic, yet economically illogical notion that to solve the housing crisis, all we have to do is keep people in their homes. No matter that millions of underwater homeowners are scraping by, pinching pennies to stay current on a home that won't be worth more than the loan for a decade, if not longer. Pour all your disposable income into a sinking mortgage and there's nothing left to spend on, well, anything else. Its bad economics at best, political theater and vote-pandering at worst.

The sad reality is that most foreclosures currently occurring, should be occurring. This is not a soulless acquiescence to banks like JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Citibank (C) and Bank of America (BAC) repossessing homes from struggling American families. It is reality. Congress claims that a strong housing market is essential to economic recovery, as it is. So why then do they continue to push legislation that prevents the housing market from actually recovery?

The real risk housing poses to the economy isn't a flood of foreclosures over the next couple years that drives down home prices. The scarier thought -- and in my view the most likely outcome given the current political climate -- is that we are still talking about the foreclosure crisis in 2016. That is five more years of a stagnant housing market, sapping confidence from our already wounded collective psyche. A cinder block tied to our economy's already feeble legs.
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • All the News and Insights You Need Right in Your Inbox | Sign Up for Our Free Newsletter

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS