Cart (0)
business newsThe Best ETF for a Truly Diverse Approach to Commodities Investing
GCC has accumulated over $724 million in assets under management, average daily volume exceeds 265,000 shares, and it's outperformed other commodity index ETFs over the past five years.
PRINT
 |
|
At least it should be. The problem with many ETFs that take the basket approach to commodities, commonly known as commodity index ETFs, is that they aren't all that diverse. Frankly, most are excessively weighted to a mixture of energy futures contracts meaning investors are basically buying an oil/natural gas ETF.
For a truly diverse approach to commodities investing, the best option may just be the GreenHaven Continuous Commodity Index ETF (GCC). By any metric, GCC has been a success. The ETF is over five years old and has accumulated over $724 million in assets under management. Average daily volume exceeds 265,000 shares and in the past five years, GCC has outperformed other commodity index ETFs, such as the PowerShares DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and the PowerShares DB Commodity Tracking Index ETF (DBC).
GCC's success lies in its diversity. The ETF offers exposure to 17 different commodities on an equal-weight exposure. That lineup includes corn, cotton, wheat, soybeans, live cattle, lean hogs, coffee, cocoa, sugar, oil, natural gas, orange juice, gold, silver, platinum and heating oil.
GreenHaven isn't shy about trumping its relative lack of energy exposure compared to comparable funds as the firm makes note of this on its Web site. Still, energy futures account for 17.6% of GCC's weight. Grains get the same allocation, but both energy and grains are well outpaced by softs (29.4%) and metals (23.5%). Livestock futures receive an allocation of almost 12%.
One knock on GCC would be an expense ratio of 0.85%, which is high by the standards of unleveraged long ETFs, but not unsurprising given the costs of having to purchase futures contracts for 17 different commodities.
The deciding factor with a fund like GCC should be whether or not the ETF has the potential to outperform comparable ETFs (it has) and single-commodity funds. In the latter case, on a year-to-date basis, GCC has bested the U.S. Oil Fund (USO) and ETNs tracking cattle, cocoa and cotton, just to name a few. That bolsters the case for making GCC a top choice for diversified commodities exposure.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor.
The Washington Mutual Wish List: Optimizing a Criminiogenic Environment
By William K. Black
Ron Paul, Master Investor
By Scott Rubin
US Government Sports Wood over Gibson Guitar
By John Thorpe
Twitter: @Benzinga
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
