The Bad Boys of Business: Citigroup

By Scott Reeves Sep 03, 2009 9:50 am

Banking on bad press.



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
“Too big to fail” is the standard rationale for federal bailouts of banks, automakers, and insurance companies.

Citigroup (C) may have been too big to succeed in a rapidly changing business environment.

Once upon a time, long before the Troubled Asset Relief Program was invented, Citigroup turned itself into a megabank that posted billions in earnings each quarter from its worldwide operations in mortgages, credit cards, trading, and merger advice.

Mortgage-backed securities punched a hole in the business model, and top managers were slow to recognize the risk. The bank’s varied operations and what some called its “Balkanized” management made it difficult to take corrective action quickly. All the bank lacked were adequate controls, accountability, and the right people atop a vigorous corporate culture. As the company fell apart, many mistook lack of smarts for mendacity.

Nevertheless, the company made sense when Sandy Weill merged Travelers Group with Citicorp in 1998 to create what was ballyhooed as a “financial supermarket.” In retrospect, it just looks stupid, greedy, and a trifle evil.

In June, Citigroup lost the status of being of a component of the key 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average. In what may be the final kick down the stairs, Travelers Companies (TRV) replaced it on the index.

Getting bounced from the DJIA is a public relations setback, but a minor one, because the average is a broad gauge of the market -- not a key factor in making investment decisions.

“Being removed from the index has no impact on the company strategy nor our efforts to return Citi to sustained profitability,” says Alex Samuelson, spokesman for Citigroup. “We continue to build on the progress of the last 18 months, focusing on our strategic priorities, which are generating long-term profitability, managing, and optimizing the businesses of Citi Holdings and remaining focused on managing costs and maintaining our positive operating leverage.”

On the way down, Citigroup pumped out big, billowy clouds of optimism and sometimes acted as if it weren’t challenged by changing circumstances.

Last January, with its stock trading at about $3.67 a share, Citigroup spent $50 million on a new private jet after taking $45 billion in taxpayer funds to stay alive.

That wouldn’t be on the top of anyone’s “to-do” list if (a) they’re sane, (b) have a rudimentary understanding of public relations, and (c) give a damn.

Citigroup’s decision to buy the new jet may not be the catastrophe it appeared to be because the company ordered the plane two years ago when it was flush. But timing is everything in love, hitting the curveball and public relations. Citigroup apparently forgot, if it ever knew, that when you’re kept alive with taxpayers money, it’s smart to buy a coach ticket on a commercial flight to at least create the image of frugality.
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS