Cell Therapeutics' Cancer Drug Fails Trial
The pharma company continues to struggle; most recently it has postponed bankuptcy but its touted drug brostallicin failed miserably.
Cell Therapeutics (CTIC) often talks about the promise of its pipeline, though it has very little cash to do anything about it. The money raise it did today allows the company to postpone a July 1 bankruptcy to the end of the year. The company doesn't have enough money to complete a new pixantrone pivotal trial required by the FDA for approval. Unless its shareholders vote management 400 million more common shares to play with, Cell Therapeutics can't even raise the money.
Cell Therapeutics is notable because it has spent more than $1.4 billion in shareholder money without ever taking a drug through the approval process. It bought an approved drug and failed miserably at trying to market it. Nevertheless, Cell Therapeutics management manages to keep shareholders from revolting by promising that bigger and better things are just around the corner. One of those “better things” was supposed to be brostallicin, a new cancer drug the company is developing.
However, an abstract of next month's American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting reports that brostallicin badly failed an important randomized Phase II trial.
This was a randomized Phase II trial comparing brostallicin to the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin. They theory behind brostallicin was that it was less toxic and either equally or more effective than older drugs.
In this trial, investigators tried this theory out on patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (cancer). Patients in this trial were over 60 years of age and not fit enough to receive traditional combination chemotherapy. Patients received either brostallicin or doxorubicin. The primary endpoint of the study was tumor stabilization at 26 weeks. To be considered a success, about half the patients in the brostallicin arm needed to have stable disease or better. A total of 118 patients were enrolled.
Brostallicin failed the primary endpoint. Only 5 of 77 (6.5%) patients had stable disease or better where 37 were needed to call the trial a "success." On the other side, 10 of 36 (27.8%) of the doxorubicin patients had a successful outcome.
The secondary endpoints were no better.
On progression-free survival at one year, brostallicin mustered just 6.5% versus doxorubicin at 15.6%. Overall tumor response rate, the combination of complete and partial responses, had doxorubicin at 21.1% compared to only 3.9% for brostallicin.
One doesn't often see such a drug fail a trial as badly as brostallicin failed this trial. Cell Therapeutics touted the start of a brostallicin trial in triple-negative breast cancer in a press release in late April. Given these results, the smart money wouldn't bet on a successful outcome of this new trial.
New! The Stock Playbook on Minyanville provides nightly actionable trading ideas from Dave Dispennette. Dave's portfolio has averaged +40% per year over the last six years. Access his portfolio and get his trading insights each night. Take a FREE 14 day trial. Learn more.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

VIDEO



















