The Trouble With Case Shiller
The Case-Shiller Home Price Indices were released this morning; too bad they don't actually indicate current housing market conditions.
Here are the key excerpts from that piece that tell you why Case-Shiller should be ignored.
- The mainstream media wasted hours reporting on and analyzing the Case-Shiller indices today. Did even one pundit mention what's wrong with the Case-Shiller data? If Dow Jones used the methodology to report the Dow Industrials that Standard and Poor's uses to construct the Case-Shiller Indices (or CSI) the Dow would be reported as being at 10,650 when, in reality, it's at roughly 10,800. 10,650 is where the Dow's three-month moving average was at the end of May.
- "What does that have to do with now?" you ask. I say, "Absolutely nothing!" The fact that the numbers aren't too far apart is coincidental. The same is true of the housing market. The CSI doesn't remotely represent the current state of the housing market, which is, in fact, much lower than where the CSI shows it to be, and it has been trending drastically lower when the CSI shows it being relatively flat recently.
- Why is the CSI data both inaccurate and misleading relative to current market conditions? Let's see. The data is collected from a month ended two months ago -- in today's case, July. That data is from public sources for closed sales, not then-current contracts. So the currently reported data represents sales that happened mostly two months before that, which would be May. Then that data is aggregated with the data collected in the two previous months, for sales contracts from the two months before that (March and April), and reported as an average price for the three months. The theoretical midpoint of the data reported now is from three-and-a-half months ago, representing the average contract price from roughly five-and-a-half months ago. In other words, today's CSI represents average selling prices as of the middle of April when the homebuyers' tax credit was still skewing the market upward.
- As soon as that distortion was removed from the market, prices collapsed. CSI isn't showing that. Other data, such as the Commerce Department's new home sales price data is. Still more current data than that is also showing a sharp drop which is continuing right up to today.
- The media and its captive economist pundits treat the CSI as somehow being a good indication of current market conditions. It's anything but. It's wrong and dangerously misleading.
- The National Association of Realtors knows the real story. They track current contract prices in their multiple listing service databases. But they choose not to share this information with the public. It is not in their industry's interest to do so. If you want to know the real story, you need a few friends in the business around the US. Or you could use some of the tracking services whose data sources are current listings, and that have proven to be highly reliable trend indicators when compared with the closed sales data released months later.
- The closed sales information doesn't reach the public until after the sales are reported in the public records of each county. That's usually a month after the sale closes, hence the 3 month lag between the time the property goes under contract and the time the public has first news of that sale. It takes S&P another month to collect and assemble the data into the CSI indexes. That's why they are so late. CSI's methodology of then reporting only a three-month moving average as if it were the most recent prices further compounds the misimpression. The goal of smoothing the data only serves to slow it down and render it even more inaccurate.
A good real-time market indicator is the data from Housingtracker.net. It reports current listing prices from 55 large US metros. I have compared that data with subsequently released actual closed sales data, and the listing prices have proven to be a good indicator of the market's direction in real time. Naturally, listings prices are higher than sales prices, but a measure of listings versus sales prices published by Zillow.com shows a remarkably consistent spread that hovers around 10%. The Housingtracker data thus shows both the trend, and with the subtraction of 10%, a reasonable indication of current price level.
Housingtracker indicates a current median asking price for the 55 US metros of $218,886 as of January 30. That's a month-to-month increase of 0.5% and a year-to-year increase of 3.8%. That's the real state of prices. It's a far cry from CSI's ancient history showing prices down 1.3% month to month, and 3.7% year over year. As far as representing the current market, those numbers just are not true.
I ignore CSI in my work, but here's a chart of several indicators that I do track that will give you some idea of where housing prices really have been and where they are now.
The Housingtracker.net median listing price is the purple line in the upper part of the chart. For the first time since the housing collapse got under way, it is now clearly showing a higher seasonal low than the previous year. This suggests that the bottom is in, at least in terms of price. All that's needed for confirmation is a higher high this summer.
Meawhile, the Case-Shillers are shilling that the market is still weakening. But clearly, that's just not the Case.
Editor's Note: Try Wall Street Examiner's Professional Edition risk free for 30 days. Click here for more information.Twitter: @Lee_Adler
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.