Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Why Bond Volatility Is Acting Abnormally

By

Have bond traders lost the fear of their own shadows and decided to pursue getting paid back at par after paying a premium?

PrintPRINT
Bond traders are funny people, sometimes intentionally so. While the one thing that will get a stock fund manager fired quickly isn't being long in a rally, the one thing that will get a bond fund manager fired quickly is having too much duration or exposure to rising interest rates in the portfolio.

When they hand you a blindfold and a cigarette, there's really no point in saying, "No thanks, I don't smoke."

One consequence of this asymmetric career risk is an equally asymmetric set of portfolio fears. Stock volatility tends to rise when the market breaks as everyone is longer than they should have been (if you bought after July 1932, you paid too much) and is looking to buy fire insurance on a burning house. Bond volatility tends to rise when yields fall and when the yield curve steepens (see The Yield Curve and Its Distortions). The one truism about bond investing in the present environment is someone at some point is going to wonder why he/she thought lending money to Uncle Sam for 30 years at 3.75% was a smart thing to do.

Yet bond volatility is falling, not rising, in the present environment. Have bond traders lost their congenital fear of their own shadows and decided to pursue the brass ring of getting paid back at par after paying a premium? We can see this phenomenon occurring in several different measures of bond volatility. The chart below is the Merrill Lynch MOVE Index, what the boys-from-bull call a "yield curve-weighted index" of fixed-income futures volatility. The secret sauce behind this weighting scheme is a 20% weight for the 2-, 5-, and 30-year futures and a 40% weight for the 10-year futures. If you're not getting paid for coming up with something like this, you're in the wrong business. It also includes annualized implied volatilities for zero-coupon bond strips.



Please note how the MOVE, based on futures and therefore subject to exigencies such as a switch in the cheapest-to-deliver contract and a one-month timeframe, has been declining more or less continuously since the Federal Reserve let it be known in July 2009 that they were going to raise rates when you pried the "higher" button from their cold, dead hands. The decline in the zero-coupon volatilities began a little later, in September 2009, and has been characterized by much lower 2-year volatility. This volatility usually rises when rates fall and when the yield curve steepens; this is the Hound of the Baskervilles get ready to treat bond portfolios like a fire hydrant.

We get the same results when we shorten up the timeframes to one month and break the MOVE components out separately. The volatilities for 2- and 5-year futures, shown in red and on a separate scale, are heading toward zero while 10- and 30-year futures volatilities are getting into single-digit range. The big spike you see in May is the "flash crash" of blessed memory; this is the one that won't happen again because the government is on the case.



The conundrum here is all signs still point to bond yields going lower in a bullish flattening of the yield curve. As short-term rates are fixed near zero, anyone chasing yield has to move out the yield curve. So far, this has worked as evidenced by the 18.55% total return on the iShares 20+ year Treasury ETF (TLT) so far in 2010. Yet years of experience have confirmed that when there isn't a cloud in the sky you should be careful where you step: The lack of fear in the bond market is the very reason you remember how to be afraid.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE