TIPS Market Not Buying Deflation Nonsense
It's actually pricing in the risk of higher inflation.
Bogart: Now tell her that you’ve met a lot of dames, but she is really something special.
Allen: That she won’t believe.
Bogart: Oh, no?
Allen to woman: I have met a lot of dames, but you are really something special.
Woman: Really?
Allen: She bought it!
If this doesn't summarize the relationship between the FOMC and the ever-gullible bond markets, what does? I grew it in an era when a Federal Reserve that argued the need for higher inflation would have prompted a torches-and-pitchfork march up Constitution Avenue where, as the diplomats would say, a frank and useful exchange of views would have ensued.
Bogart: Tell them there’s deflation!
Benny: That they won’t believe.
Bogart: Oh, no?
Benny: I’ve seen a lot of markets, but you're really flatulent. Oops, I mean there’s a danger of deflation.
Bond market: Really?
Benny: They bought it!
Not Buying It
The TIPS market is reacting to all of this by pricing in the risk of higher inflation, as well it should. Even with the commercial banking system not turning the monetary base into credit and expanding the money supply, and even with the fiscal drag from our bloated public sector, the betting has to be that sooner or later they can print enough money to make it worthless.
Get Me the Dubious Achievement Hall of Fame on Line 2!
We can see this in two ways. First, the term structure of real TIPS yields displayed here on an issue-by-issue basis has remained fairly flat since TIPS breakevens hit their recent high on April 29, 2010. Granted, they have declined somewhat in 2010, but so what? Real generic 10-year TIPS yields have been declining since the dotcom bust in 2000, and no one was fretting about deflation then.

Click to enlarge
Second, the term structure of inflation expectations for generic TIPS has been flat over the same period save for a decline in 30-year breakevens. If deflation was keeping the TIPS market awake at night, we'd see something akin to the negative TIPS breakevens of late 2008.

Click to enlarge
The time has come to ask, “Won’t someone stop this senseless slaughter?” Larry Summers had to walk the plank last week for the failures of Keynesian demand management, and justifiably so. The Bernanke Federal Reserve must be held accountable for its policies, continued from the Greenspan era, of printing money to solve every problem. The net result has been the inability of risk-averse savers to earn a return, a dollar that's being saved only by irresponsibility elsewhere, direct monetization of Treasury debt, and an expansion of defined-benefit plans’ unfunded liabilities. Gold near $1,300 per ounce isn't the markets’ roar of approval of their actions.The bizarre aspect of all this is bonds are still bullish and if I'm correct, we're in for a future bubble therein. If you own mid-term Treasuries directly or in ETF form (IEF, TLT) you'll be fine for a while. But once the bond market catches on to the dishonorable intentions of the Federal Reserve, you won't want to be long the things in any way, shape, manner, or form.
At least that's the way the world looked in 1972.
Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

business news
PRINT



















