Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Bush Vs. Obama: Who's Better for Investors? An Update

By

The comparison going into second terms, if there is to be one for Obama, will be interesting as the U.S. equity markets hit its all-time high in 2007 before some unpleasantness unfolded.

PrintPRINT
I know it sounds like a Jeff Foxworthy-style situation, but as a general rule, when you have to stop and ask yourself, "Should I be doing this?" you have answered the question already with a resounding, "No." But I am going to do it anyway, and that is update last January's Bush vs. Obama: Who's Better for Investors? Fortunately for all involved, neither occupant of the White House stirred strong emotions, so I can dodge one bullet there.

As before, the comparison periods will begin with the starting dates when investors and other people, including consumers and taxpayers, could discount fully the incoming administration. That would be the December 2000 Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore and the September 2008 debate between Senators Obama and McCain. In both cases I am going to stop with the data points two days before the respective presidents' third State of the Union addresses.

Stock Index Comparison
First, please keep in mind I have plotted the return path of the Russell 3000 inversely below; as I noted last year, the return paths up to the second State of the Union addresses were opposite one another. The path during the first administration of the second Bush's third year started to climb on March 12, 2003 as we were about to enter the second Iraq War for the first time. The average daily return for the Russell 3000 prior to this date during the Bush era was -0.085%. It rose to 0.179% going into the January 2004 speech. For you stat-hounds, the two periods were different at a 98.43% confidence level.

If we divide the Obama era up along the same time segments, the comparable average daily returns of 0.019% and 0.022%. That is only a 1.94% probability of difference.



United in Junk
What about high-yield corporate bonds, referred to sometimes as "junk?" Whether your political leanings involve an elephant, a donkey or some other odd choice for a political symbol, take heart in the similarity and bipartisan celebration of low-quality seen below. The average daily returns on the Bank of America-Merrill Lynch High-Yield Master II index during the Bush and Obama administrations have been 0.038% and 0.053%. Whenever someone asks you rhetorically, "Is this a great country, or what," you can cite these data in affirmative response.



The probability these two means are different is a middle-of-the-road 52.0%.

Forward to the Future
The comparison going into second terms, if there is to be a second Obama term, will be interesting as the U.S. equity markets hit its all-time high in 2007 before some unpleasantness unfolded. We will have what financial public relations specialists refer to as difficult followed by easy comparisons. I would not mind a reprise of events ending in July 2007; even though the highs occurred in November, the cracks were visible already. I could do without a parallel to 2008, though.


Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE