Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Banks Only Think They're Turning the Corner


CEO statements and recent reports show hope, but the basic business of banking is still troubled.

Editor's Note: This article was written by Robert Barone, head of Ancora West. Mr. Barone currently serves on AAA's Finance and Investment Committee which oversees $5 billion of investible assets.

Wall Street was upbeat in mid-April because the country's four largest banks -- Bank of America (BAC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Citigroup (C), and Wells Fargo (WFC) -- all reported what Wall Street considered "turning the corner" earnings and all the CEOs except Bank of America's Brian Moynihan were positive on the immediate future. The data, however, don't lead to such conclusions.

Profits rose at two of the big four. Citi's profit rose to $4.43 billion in the first quarter of 2010 from $1.59 million in the first quarter of 2009. Believe it or not, Citi's profits were the highest reported among the group despite the fact that it has been selling off many of its most lucrative businesses, such as the Smith Barney brokerage unit. At JPMorgan, profits rose to $3.33 billion from $2.14 billion in the first quarter of 2009. At Bank of America and Wells Fargo, profits fell. The $2.5 billion profit at Wells Fargo was 16% lower while Bank of America's $3.2 billion profit was lower by 25%.

Sources of Profit

The basic source of profits at all four of the institutions was their proprietary trading operations (75% at JPMorgan, more than 50% at Bank of America, and 40% at Wells Fargo). No wonder there's such a furor over the proposed Volcker rule (restrictions on proprietary trading) in the financial reform legislation.

The health of the industry is often measured by top-line revenue growth. Using this measure wouldn't lead to the conclusion that the industry is "healthy," as at three of the four, top-line revenue fell from year-earlier levels. At Citi, top line was down 5.8%. It was the lowest in four quarters at Wells Fargo, and it fell 11% at Bank of America. Only at JPMorgan did top line rise (5.0%).

Asset Quality

As measured by asset quality, the basic banking function was still in the doldrums. Citi said its charge-offs were higher. At JPMorgan, defaults were at an all-time high and mortgage defaults continued to rise. The $131 million loss in JPMorgan's retail banking unit was much lower than the $474 million profit a year earlier. Only credit card losses of $303 million showed improvement over the $547 million loss in the first quarter of 2009. That's not a lot of evidence to indicate that "this would be the makings of a good recovery," as suggested by Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan's CEO.

At Wells Fargo, the charge-off percentage was a high 2.71% versus 1.54% a year earlier, and equivalent to the charge-off percentage in the fourth quarter of 2009. This is surprising. Normally, in a bad earnings year like 2009, a bank writes off everything it can in the fourth quarter so that the next year looks better. This is known as a "kitchen sink" quarter. The fact that the charge-off percentage continued at the "kitchen sink" rate in the first quarter of 2010 indicates that asset quality has continued to deteriorate and has exceeded management's expectations embedded in their fourth-quarter estimates. This should be of concern to the marketplace.

Charge-offs at Bank of America were quite high at 4.44% ($10.8 billion) in the first quarter of 2010 compared to 2.85% ($6.9 billion) a year earlier. In addition, they rose sequentially from the fourth quarter of 2009 (3.71%). And 30-day delinquencies, the precursor to charge-offs, now stand at a whopping 8.5% of the loan portfolio. Again, the market should be concerned with such deterioration. At JPMorgan and Citi, first-quarter charge-offs this year were only slightly better than those in the fourth quarter of 2009 (C: 1.14% versus 1.17%; JPM: 4.83% versus 5.27%). How the senior executives of these institutions can be upbeat about these figures is puzzling.

Misleading Provisions

One of the ways banks manipulate their earnings is through the addition or non-addition to their loan-loss reserves. This used to be a fairly simple calculation, but over the last few years this has become a complex algorithm that, while it looks very precise and detailed, is based on assumptions and judgments that can be manipulated to achieve desired results. So, earnings have to be examined in light of loan quality and the provision for loan losses. At Citi, while charge-offs were higher and no real improvement occurred in asset quality, the provision for future losses fell 16% from the first quarter of 2009 and 5% from the fourth quarter of 2009. At JPMorgan, the provision fell by 30% to $7 billion from $10 billion. Without this $3 billion reduction, the $3.33 billion of profitability would have all but disappeared! Wells Fargo's provision of $5.33 billion was higher than the $4.56 billion of the first quarter of 2009. While it was slightly lower than the $5.91 billion of the fourth quarter of 2009, Wells Fargo clearly sees significant loan issues ahead. Bank of America's loan-loss provision fell to $9.8 billion from $13.4 billion in the first quarter of 2009, a $3.6 billion reduction. With delinquencies and charge-offs at all-time highs, a $3.6 billion reduction in provision casts doubt about the quality of the $3.2 billion profit. After all, without the provision reduction, profits here, too, would be significantly lower.

Other Economic Indicators

Loan delinquencies and foreclosures are at record highs. There are at least 18 more months of foreclosures issues as the 5/1 ARMS and Alt-A mortgages of 2005 and 2006 reset in 2010 and 2011. Yet, despite these facts, loan-loss provisions at three of the four were significantly reduced. The rationality for such reductions would be much more compelling had loan losses and delinquencies shown marked improvement. But they didn't. There may be trends in the internal data that only the banks can see. But, not all of them see such trends. Wells Fargo, for example, increased its loss provision. And while Bank of America provided a whole lot less for future losses indicating an upbeat future, its CEO indicated that the bank's loan demand was weak and the mortgage division (which includes Angelo Mozilo's Countrywide) continued to struggle.


The bottom line is that it doesn't appear that credit strains have been resolved. Even if the worst has passed, there still appears to be several more quarters of severe credit issues that will continue to be a huge anchor holding back basic bank profits on the micro level, and economic growth and employment on the macro level. Only when delinquencies and foreclosures are rapidly declining will the US economy take off.

Don't be fooled by upbeat CEO statements or irrational market behavior. The basic business of banking is still troubled. This, of course, is obvious by the continuing record number of weekly small bank failures. But it's also obvious in the big bank data when analyzed:

  • Most of the profitable revenue was generated from proprietary trading at the big institutions, not from basic banking; and this source is now threatened by the financial reform legislation;

  • Top-line revenue is still falling;

  • Delinquencies and charge-offs remain at record levels;

  • The reduction in provision for loan losses, which enhances earnings, in the face of record delinquencies and foreclosures leaves much room for skepticism.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos