Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Avon Case Study Highlights Where Consumer Analysts Go Wrong


Valuation analysis suggests there's not much reason for portfolio managers to bother researching the company right now.

As I write my consumer sector analyses for this site, I hope to impart some investment wisdom that readers can use in other sectors and in their own analysis.

I have found that good valuation analysis is important to investing, obviously. Good preliminary valuation work on a stock can save you a lot of research time by directing you to the best opportunities and allowing you to forget about many other stocks. But there are still many people who stick to PE ratios and who shy away from discounted future earnings or cash flow approaches, which is my favorite valuation method for consumer stocks.

Another important approach is to keep an eye on the forest rather than the trees, again obviously. But many times even institutional analysts and portfolio managers do not.

Avon (AVP) is a case in point. While I have had big problems with Andrea Jung, the recently deposed CEO, for many years and wonder why she will be staying on the board, the hiring of a new CEO from outside the company, when it happens, will be a catalyst for some value investors to take a hard look at the company for a turnaround. But let's do some valuation analysis using the big picture (forest) considerations placed into an academically (and real world, too) correct three-stage earnings growth model adjusted for risk.

The Yahoo sell-side analyst average earnings per share (EPS) for 2012 is $1.76, though that is almost certainly higher than normalizable levels (via my gut) and will be higher than what it actually report after a new CEO clears the decks with a lower bar for his future performance. The sell side five-year EPS growth CAGR is 6.5%, which experience tells me is worthless, especially with no base number to hang your hat on, but I need numbers for my valuation exposition. Another consideration for my valuation is a terminal earnings growth rate of 2% for years 11 through infinity, which is fairly standard for consumer staples.

Here's where the market screws up. Because Avon sells cosmetics, the company is considered to be a consumer staples company, which has a low risk relative to the market. I typically assign a 4% risk discount to a big, large-cap consumer staples company in addition to the risk-free rate, which in this case is 4% (3% for the 30-year Treasury, plus 1% for a less-than AAA issuer and the fact that interest rates are unsustainably low). The end result is a $36 price target, 109% above the $17 price now.

Back to the forest. Avon is not only a consumer staples stock. It's also a retailer of its own products. (Amazing how many institutional investors -- analysts and portfolio managers -- do not understand this.) And it has been in the retail side that it has had most of its problems over the years. A decent retailer would be worthy of a 7% risk discount; average 4 and 7 and you get a 5.5% risk discount for Avon. The deserved price is now $29, a 65% appreciation. Use 6% for its being a non-decent retailer (sales via reps) direct and you get $25.

Avon finds it difficult to grow or even maintain earnings and sales reps in mature economies because of the inroads from retailers, mostly mass merchandisers focused on lower end customers. You can go into Walmart (WMT) and find Rimmel and some other brands selling below Avon's prices. So Avon is in a race to stay ahead of retailers in the developing world. But we know that will not end well for Avon. So it should be obvious that a 2% terminal growth rate is too high. It could be 0 or maybe minus 2%, or somewhat more negative. Using the 5.5% discount and a 0% terminal growth rate results in a $25 price. A negative 2% terminal growth implies $23.

If the new base earnings level ends up being $1.40, down only 20% (my gut would say that that is a real possibility), and you assume a 6% risk premium is justified with negative 2% terminal growth, the present $17 stock price is justified.

This is why I like three stage earnings discount models and will generally use them. It is also why I do not think that there is much reason to do research on Avon now.

Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Featured Videos