Amazon Could Profit if Forced to Collect Sales Tax
A law requiring online vendors to charge sales tax could bury small retailers -- or send them scurrying for help to platforms like Amazon's.
As states face growing budget deficits, momentum is growing to force online retailers to collect taxes from purchases made by the states' residents.
A 1992 Supreme Court decision said that online retailers are not required to pay sales taxes in states that they do not have a physical presence. However, as online retailing continues to grab market share from local retailers, states are losing billions of dollars in tax revenue to online retailers like Amazon.com (AMZN) and eBay (EBAY).
Local retailers are also pushing for change because they are unable to compete with online retailers' low prices. Because they don't have to pay sales taxes, companies like Amazon.com and Blue Nile (NILE) can lower their prices slightly below local prices and still enjoy a much higher profit margin. States also lose out because as sales shift online and out of the state, so do jobs and the revenue they bring to state budgets.
States and local retailers have taken their case to Congress, which has the right to regulate interstate commerce. They are pressing for changes to current laws that allow online retailers to avoid paying taxes.
After years of fighting states' attempts to make the online retailer collect sales taxes, Amazon.com is supporting efforts to get Congress to pass legislation that would force online retailers like Amazon to pay taxes. Although the move might seem altruistic on Amazon's part, smaller online retailers feel that the motive behind Amazon's change of heart is simple greed.
If online retailers are made to pay local sales taxes, they will have to be in compliance with dozens of different state tax laws. Although this won't be difficult for large online businesses like Amazon.com and eBay, it could be a nightmare for small online retailers.
By backing the call for online retailers to pay taxes, Amazon.com might just be trying to get rid of its smaller online competitors and prevent new ones from entering the market. It's worth noting that Amazon.com isn't just an online retailer but that it also sells services to other businesses, such as letting them use Amazon's platform. Amazon.com said that it's willing to help small online retailers deal with the tax issues by "collecting sales tax
Bullish: Traders who believe that Amazon.com is going to be the eventual winner if online retailers start paying sales taxes might want to consider the following trades:
- Buying Amazon.com stock might be a good contrarian move if the stock dips after a law is passed requiring online retailers to pay state sales taxes. The move could see Amazon.com getting a bigger slice of online spending and could be a boost for its services business.
- Stocks like Blue Nile and PetMed Express (PETS) are not as well placed as Amazon.com is if they are forced to start paying state sales taxes. Shorting these stocks could be profitable if they are soon paying sales taxes just like their brick-and-mortar competitors.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by Daniel James Hayden IV.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
How to Profit from Call for Deeper Eurozone Integration
By Daniel James Hayden IV
Chinese Manufacturing Contracts
By Paul Quintaro
These Stocks May Be Better Than Their Dow Equivalents
By Gordon Wilcox
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter