Abercrombie Is Worn Out and Quickly Fading
By
Kristin Graham
Nov 19, 2009 8:30 am
Don't follow the numbers on this one.
Since listing five reasons to sell Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) back in August, the retail stock has risen another 32%. Year to date, the stock is up over 75%. And what really takes the cake is Goldman Sachs (GS) and Credit Suisse (CS) both upgraded Abercrombie earlier this month.
I’m far from ashamed of my recommendation. Abercrombie is a teeny-bopping train wreck. Posting third-quarter results that were once again much worse than its peers, Abercrombie has problems unrelated to the recession. For more on Abercrombie's third quarter, see Abercrombie Just Doesn't Fit.The downturn has just exasperated it. And I want to reiterate my extreme bearishness toward the retailer.
Abercrombie was once as popular among Wall Street analysts as it was throughout the halls of high schools across the country. A genius management team slapped a moose logo on basic, preppy attire and successfully convinced fashion enthusiastic teens to pay huge premiums for its merchandise. The result led to gross margins surpassing 66% -- unheard of in the retail industry -- and alluring growth.
But all good things come to an end and Abercrombie’s strategy became outdated. The company has failed to adapt to evolving trends and -- gasp -- can’t sell the same exact sweatshirt lined with the word ABERCROMBIE today that it sold a decade ago. In fact, I saw nearly the same coat being sold that I purchased more than five seasons ago.
With 12 straight quarters of double-digit comps under its belt now, Wall Street has attributed poor performance to management not properly playing out the recession by not running steep promotions.
I disagree. Abercrombie was right to not run around its stores with red pens slashing ticket prices. As I’ve mentioned before, that's a brand-killing technique that will come back to haunt the retailers that have implemented that tactic. Of course, desperate Abercrombie eventually jumped on the markdown bandwagon and is now not only facing a plummeting top line but also a slimming gross margin. See more on Abercrombie in Minyanville's Fashion's Dirty Laundry.
Abercrombie’s problem wasn't that it was too late to the discount party. It was because its style has become irrelevant among today’s funky and more mature dressing youth. As Urban Outfitters (URBN) and True Religion (TRLG) have proven, retailers can maintain their premium prices and uphold their high-end brand status if they offer unique and funkier merchandise. And J.Crew (JCG) is an ideal example of how a preppy retailer has successfully adapted its style to remain relevant.
During booming times, Abercrombie was able to keep its top line buoyant by expanding its store base. And of course, shoppers were buying up merchandise from about any retailer as cash was freely flowing from their wallets. In tight times, however, consumers are more conservative with their purchases and carefully select items they find valuable.
Some refer to Abercrombie as an iconic retailer. I see it as an iconic brand that has been laid to rest in a vault labeled “turn of the century fashion”. Abercrombie’s sales started sagging in 2006 before even the slightest sign of this recession was visible.
I’ve stated before that the retail industry will continue to shrink until supply starts to match new demand levels. With fewer dollars to go around, the weakest links will get weeded out.
Like the jeans hanging behind the navy shutter doors of every retail outlet, the Abercrombie brand looks worn out and I don’t see any chance of its problems being patched up.
Investors can follow the money on this stock. But consider yourself warned that this investment will prove a major fashion flop in the long run -- it already is in the fashion world.
I’m far from ashamed of my recommendation. Abercrombie is a teeny-bopping train wreck. Posting third-quarter results that were once again much worse than its peers, Abercrombie has problems unrelated to the recession. For more on Abercrombie's third quarter, see Abercrombie Just Doesn't Fit.The downturn has just exasperated it. And I want to reiterate my extreme bearishness toward the retailer.
Abercrombie was once as popular among Wall Street analysts as it was throughout the halls of high schools across the country. A genius management team slapped a moose logo on basic, preppy attire and successfully convinced fashion enthusiastic teens to pay huge premiums for its merchandise. The result led to gross margins surpassing 66% -- unheard of in the retail industry -- and alluring growth.
But all good things come to an end and Abercrombie’s strategy became outdated. The company has failed to adapt to evolving trends and -- gasp -- can’t sell the same exact sweatshirt lined with the word ABERCROMBIE today that it sold a decade ago. In fact, I saw nearly the same coat being sold that I purchased more than five seasons ago.
With 12 straight quarters of double-digit comps under its belt now, Wall Street has attributed poor performance to management not properly playing out the recession by not running steep promotions.
I disagree. Abercrombie was right to not run around its stores with red pens slashing ticket prices. As I’ve mentioned before, that's a brand-killing technique that will come back to haunt the retailers that have implemented that tactic. Of course, desperate Abercrombie eventually jumped on the markdown bandwagon and is now not only facing a plummeting top line but also a slimming gross margin. See more on Abercrombie in Minyanville's Fashion's Dirty Laundry.
Abercrombie’s problem wasn't that it was too late to the discount party. It was because its style has become irrelevant among today’s funky and more mature dressing youth. As Urban Outfitters (URBN) and True Religion (TRLG) have proven, retailers can maintain their premium prices and uphold their high-end brand status if they offer unique and funkier merchandise. And J.Crew (JCG) is an ideal example of how a preppy retailer has successfully adapted its style to remain relevant.
During booming times, Abercrombie was able to keep its top line buoyant by expanding its store base. And of course, shoppers were buying up merchandise from about any retailer as cash was freely flowing from their wallets. In tight times, however, consumers are more conservative with their purchases and carefully select items they find valuable.
Some refer to Abercrombie as an iconic retailer. I see it as an iconic brand that has been laid to rest in a vault labeled “turn of the century fashion”. Abercrombie’s sales started sagging in 2006 before even the slightest sign of this recession was visible.
I’ve stated before that the retail industry will continue to shrink until supply starts to match new demand levels. With fewer dollars to go around, the weakest links will get weeded out.
Like the jeans hanging behind the navy shutter doors of every retail outlet, the Abercrombie brand looks worn out and I don’t see any chance of its problems being patched up.
Investors can follow the money on this stock. But consider yourself warned that this investment will prove a major fashion flop in the long run -- it already is in the fashion world.

No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



(4)
Reply
2009-11-20 08:55:24
Germans will storm the shops when they open
I just can say:
Germans are telling there friends to go to shop for them at A&F if they are in London. A&F is considered very coool .
They will storm like hell the shops if the first two will open.
I think you need to think not only US with your comment
Germans are telling there friends to go to shop for them at A&F if they are in London. A&F is considered very coool .
They will storm like hell the shops if the first two will open.
I think you need to think not only US with your comment
2009-11-20 09:37:56
word choice
Did the author mean "exacerbate" rather than "exasperate"? Common mistake and understandable under a tight deadline. I do agree that Abercrombie is a has been. The kids aren't into it anymore and the firm needs to overhaul it's image again.
2009-11-20 11:31:49
The Endangered Moose
To me, the corporation seems to be failing at two things--earning new customers and retaining the existing base. Abercrombie & Fitch has raised prices on goods that have been on the market essentially unchanged for a few years while its customers have offered periodic sales. Even if Abercrombie wants to position itself with higher brands that do not have "$2 for $20" sales, it must realize that it markets mostly to teens, who don't have as much cash to burn due to a slumping economy. The teens who were shopping at Abercrombie & Fitch are now going to American Eagle for similar goods at lower prices.
Customers who have grown out of their teen years are not shopping at Abercrombie & Fitch either. The Ruehl concept failed for the same reason the Cadillac Cimarron did--Abercrombie and Hollister shirts were rebadged with a different name and logo and sold for a higher price. Instead of flocking to Ruehl, the folks in their twenties who wish to purchase big-name fashion goods are buying Polo Ralph Lauren and Lacoste, both of which are recognized and respected in the adult world (teen brands typically are not), sell for prices similar to Abercrombie's, and provide higher quality goods without the destruction that has become a trademark of Abercrombie & Fitch style over the last few years. Additionally, Macy's sometimes will have a "private sale", where all merchandise from famous designers is 25% off.
The slow economy isn't helping to win new customers, either. Growing children require a lot of clothing, and with disposable incomes slashed, parents are buying apparel elsewhere, whether it be at American Eagle, a department store, an outlet mall, or a "big box" discounter. Trends have trumped brand names in recent times and it no longer appears that stamping a large logo across a shirt will make it profitable. There will always be Abercrombie & Fitch customers, just as AMC continued to sell Eagles during the mid-80s despite the company's troubles, but they definitely appear to be fewer and farther between.
Abercrombie & Fitch used to update its styles periodically. Every new floorset would guarantee an entirely new set of products with only a few staples held over from the previous season. However, the current lineup of products looks outdated and many of the items have been around for several years. While this works with "staple" items such as solid color polos (it definitely has with other retailers), it does not work well with teen favorites such as t-shirts and hoodies. The "destroyed" trend is practically over yet Abercrombie & Fitch is marketing it like it's 2005, when it seemed to be at its peak.
Abercrombie & Fitch needs only to look at what happened to Merry-Go-Round if they want to see what is on the horizon if they do not change quickly. There are some parallels between these two once-trendy corporations that look to continue if Abercrombie & Fitch cannot do something quickly. International expansion alone may not be enough. After all, expansion was one of the factors behind Merry-Go-Round's demise.
Customers who have grown out of their teen years are not shopping at Abercrombie & Fitch either. The Ruehl concept failed for the same reason the Cadillac Cimarron did--Abercrombie and Hollister shirts were rebadged with a different name and logo and sold for a higher price. Instead of flocking to Ruehl, the folks in their twenties who wish to purchase big-name fashion goods are buying Polo Ralph Lauren and Lacoste, both of which are recognized and respected in the adult world (teen brands typically are not), sell for prices similar to Abercrombie's, and provide higher quality goods without the destruction that has become a trademark of Abercrombie & Fitch style over the last few years. Additionally, Macy's sometimes will have a "private sale", where all merchandise from famous designers is 25% off.
The slow economy isn't helping to win new customers, either. Growing children require a lot of clothing, and with disposable incomes slashed, parents are buying apparel elsewhere, whether it be at American Eagle, a department store, an outlet mall, or a "big box" discounter. Trends have trumped brand names in recent times and it no longer appears that stamping a large logo across a shirt will make it profitable. There will always be Abercrombie & Fitch customers, just as AMC continued to sell Eagles during the mid-80s despite the company's troubles, but they definitely appear to be fewer and farther between.
Abercrombie & Fitch used to update its styles periodically. Every new floorset would guarantee an entirely new set of products with only a few staples held over from the previous season. However, the current lineup of products looks outdated and many of the items have been around for several years. While this works with "staple" items such as solid color polos (it definitely has with other retailers), it does not work well with teen favorites such as t-shirts and hoodies. The "destroyed" trend is practically over yet Abercrombie & Fitch is marketing it like it's 2005, when it seemed to be at its peak.
Abercrombie & Fitch needs only to look at what happened to Merry-Go-Round if they want to see what is on the horizon if they do not change quickly. There are some parallels between these two once-trendy corporations that look to continue if Abercrombie & Fitch cannot do something quickly. International expansion alone may not be enough. After all, expansion was one of the factors behind Merry-Go-Round's demise.
2009-11-21 10:39:52
Problem
I know the problem. They need to stop spraying that Perfume! I can't walk buy that store in the mall i have to walk all they way on the other side to just get by it. I know a lot of people with allergies and i am sure that is why they are not getting business.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved





















