Cart (0)
VIDEOVIX, VXX and Time Decay
Contango could adversely affect prices going forward.
 |
|
While it looks like today is a good day to be long volatility, getting four-thirteenths of the move in the VIX with a VIX ETN does not look like an efficient way to play the volatility trade. In fact, I have discussed the issue of what I call the VXX juice factor on a number of occasions and have concluded that on average, anyone owning VXX should not expect to capture more than 50% of the move in the VIX, at least based on data since the January 30 launch of VXX. Going forward, however, 40% might be a more realistic target.
A reader asked about the extent to which VXX returns may be adversely impacted by time decay, rolling and other issues.
When it comes to VXX price erosion, there are 2 primary factors to consider. The first is the mean-reverting tendency of the VIX and VIX futures. The second factor is the daily rebalancing of the two VIX futures that are utilized to calculate the value of VXX.
The VXX calculation is derived from the two nearest months of VIX futures. At the moment, this means the May futures and the June futures. For the sake of simplicity, I will refer to these as the front month and second month futures. I’ll explain the calculation with an example.
VIX options expire on Wednesday, May 20th this month (see the 2009 expiration calendar), which means that at the close of business on the day before expiration, May 19th, VIX will hold exclusively the June VIX futures (VX-M9). As each calendar day passes, VXX will sell one-thirtieth of the June VIX futures position and buy an identical amount of the July VIX futures, so that the percentage holdings of the front month and second month futures always create a synthetic blend of a basket of VIX futures with a constant maturity of 30 days.
(Note that this is different from the calculations of the cash VIX, where the front month and second month options roll forward one month 8 days before VIX options expiration.)As long as the near month and second month futures are similar in price, the daily rebalancing has little effect on the price of VXX. When the term structure has a steep slope and there is a substantial difference in price between the front month and the second month (as was the case with SPX options on November 20, 2008), the daily rebalancing can generate its own profit and loss.
As the graphic below shows, there was a 0.75 difference between the May and June futures settlement prices yesterday. Calculating 1/30 * 0.75, yesterday’s daily rebalancing probably resulted in a 0.02 or 0.03 change in price.
In terms of pricing implications, when VIX futures are in contango (upward sloping over time, second month more expensive than front month), there will be a daily loss of value due to rebalancing. On the other hand, when VIX futures are in backwardation (downward sloping over time), the daily rebalancing process will generate a gain.
Following the launch of VXX on January 30, VIX futures were consistently in backwardation until the beginning of April, at which point the term structure flattened out. At present, there is some slight contango that could adversely impact VXX prices going forward.
For more on this subject, I recommend Standard & Poor’s white paper on VXX returns: Directional Exposure to Volatility Via Listed Futures.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
