VIX: Backwardation to the Future
By
Adam Warner
Mar 04, 2009 12:00 pm
Options volatility still too high.
Lots of buzz about the large backwardation in the VIX. The "spot" VIX was over 51 at the time; the March VIX future was roughly a 47, July roughly 43.

Now, of course, it's an accurate point. That's the "spot" VIX premium, and it's on the high end.
But here's the rub: It doesn't mean a whole lot beyond what we already know.
The VIX tends to "mean revert." Shorter-term moves one way tend to reverse course and return to some perceived mean. The best definitions of a "mean" are longer-dated volatility measures - or perhaps a moving average of shorter-term measures.
The longer the duration, the less noise, and the more it resembles lasting volatility assumptions. So logically, the shorter-term measure should "revert" to the longer term one.
VIX futures are not volatility estimates, per se. They're estimates of where the VIX will be on a given date. So as a "mean" estimator, they do fine.
So, what's the problem with this analysis?
Two things: One, there's no magical premium of the VIX, beyond a given VIX future, that signals a reversal is particularly imminent. The VIX yesterday at midday was merely 8% above the March future. There's no reason that can't that go to 18%, or even 28%. In fact, the VIX did soar way beyond near-month futures all the way back in October.
Two, a small subset of the time, the VIX itself is the mean, and it's the futures and longer dated options measures (like the VXV, which is the VIX for 90-day options) that move.
Look, I believe the selling in the market is over-extended. And I believe that options volatility is too high, based on actual market volatility. So I agree with the premise that the VIX will decline.
But the futures, by definition, are saying the exact same thing. It's just kind of a redundant observation, and not one I would hang my hat on to presage the next rally. If you bought every time some oscillating rubber band or another extended beyond normal range, you'd essentially be either broke, or a host of Power Lunch by now.
Minyanville will soon be launching an options newsletter - OptionSmith by Steve Smith. For more details, click here. To be notified for a FREE Trial as soon as it's launched email optionsmith@minyanville.com

Now, of course, it's an accurate point. That's the "spot" VIX premium, and it's on the high end.
But here's the rub: It doesn't mean a whole lot beyond what we already know.
The VIX tends to "mean revert." Shorter-term moves one way tend to reverse course and return to some perceived mean. The best definitions of a "mean" are longer-dated volatility measures - or perhaps a moving average of shorter-term measures.
The longer the duration, the less noise, and the more it resembles lasting volatility assumptions. So logically, the shorter-term measure should "revert" to the longer term one.
VIX futures are not volatility estimates, per se. They're estimates of where the VIX will be on a given date. So as a "mean" estimator, they do fine.
So, what's the problem with this analysis?
Two things: One, there's no magical premium of the VIX, beyond a given VIX future, that signals a reversal is particularly imminent. The VIX yesterday at midday was merely 8% above the March future. There's no reason that can't that go to 18%, or even 28%. In fact, the VIX did soar way beyond near-month futures all the way back in October.
Two, a small subset of the time, the VIX itself is the mean, and it's the futures and longer dated options measures (like the VXV, which is the VIX for 90-day options) that move.
Look, I believe the selling in the market is over-extended. And I believe that options volatility is too high, based on actual market volatility. So I agree with the premise that the VIX will decline.
But the futures, by definition, are saying the exact same thing. It's just kind of a redundant observation, and not one I would hang my hat on to presage the next rally. If you bought every time some oscillating rubber band or another extended beyond normal range, you'd essentially be either broke, or a host of Power Lunch by now.
Minyanville will soon be launching an options newsletter - OptionSmith by Steve Smith. For more details, click here. To be notified for a FREE Trial as soon as it's launched email optionsmith@minyanville.com
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

VIDEO



















