Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Is Put Demand a Sign for the Bulls?


Gauging whether this is smart money -- or just nervous money.

While we were dozing in the midst of ever-declining volatility, it turns out there's been a little options buying going on under the surface. This from Bloomberg:

"Downside skew, which gauges the relative cost of buying insurance against a slide in stocks, is now higher than it was when the S&P 500 dropped to a 12-year low on March 9. That indicates a 'relatively high chance of downside moves.

"Global equity markets are beginning to falter after 3 straight months of gains in March, April, and May. The S&P 500 has retreated 5.4% since June 12, bringing an end to the benchmark's biggest 3-month rally in more than 70 years amid concern that the global recession may yet deepen.

" 'The sharp move higher in risky assets off the early March lows had pushed hedging to the back burner,' a team of analysts led by New York-based Sivan Mahadevan writes. 'Downside skew has risen recently, implying that the probability of large negative moves is actually somewhat higher.' "

If this is in fact the highest skew since March, I would agree it signals demand for out-of-the-money (OTM) puts. (That's the definition of why skew would lift).

But let's think about it for a second. The analysts assume there's an increased probability of a negative move. But why? Because someone is buying puts? Looked at another way, isn't this actually bullish? Why do we assume that the buying is being done by smart money rather than nervous money? Why can't this just be a relatively sensible and innocuous insurance buy against a good quarter?

The bottom line -- as my friend Don Fishback always reminds me: We just don't know the answer to any of these questions. All we know is that put demand increased, which -- without any other information -- is actually bullish.

And as long as we're on the subject, the chart here shows a ratio of the VIX to the VXO. The VIX incorporates every near- and/or second-nearest-month strike in its calculation until it hits 2 with no bids. So it picks up lots of at-the-money puts and incorporates skew in its formula.

The VXO -- which, unlike the VIX, is an options-based exchange -- just takes a few near-money strikes. Theoretically, this ratio should hit a high when skew is most pronounced. Yet it troughed in March, which seems to make little sense.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos