Op-Ed: All Signs Point to Bulls?
Extreme overbought readings can be seen, paradoxically, as extremely bullish.
When the market was near its 667 low, many said the market would not bottom until the VIX and the put/call ratios had spiked. I disagreed with that assessment, and -- though these indicators did not spike -- the market did indeed bottom, and has since risen about 20%.
Today, I'd like to offer another counter-consensus call regarding some widely followed technical indicators that indicate that the market is "overbought" or "oversold."
There's a great deal of chatter about various oscillators showing extreme overbought readings, and there's something of a consensus that this is a good reason to take profits, or to at least be cautious about buying until the market works off its overbought readings.
I'm not aware of any empirical support for the effectiveness of trading strategies based on oscillators in generating excess returns. However, assuming there were such evidence, it's evident to me that -- based on the way such oscillators are constructed mathematically -- any excess returns generated by such models would have to be based on very elementary principles of mean reversion.
In other words, to the extent that oscillators are effective at all, it's because they identify certain patterns that tend to repeat themselves through time, on average. That is to say, that under normal or average conditions there is a fairly high probability of the identified pattern recurring.
The problem with using oscillators in today's environment is that there's absolutely nothing "normal" or "average" about what is going on in financial market these days. People who have been buying stocks since October 2008 because oscillators were showing extreme oversold readings have been losing fortunes.
What's the situation today?
1. A barrage of increasingly coherent policy measures by global governments and central banks to deal with the economic and financial crisis.
2. A string of data strongly suggesting that the second derivative in terms of economic activity is turning.
3. Individual and institutional investors are underinvested and are therefore being caught wrong footed by both number 1 and number 2.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter