Can the VIX Predict Pullback?

By Steve Smith Jun 23, 2009 2:20 pm
Index is most useful when used as a contrary indicator.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+
Yesterday’s steep sell-off was accompanied by a pop in implied-volatility readings. Gauges such as the VIX and VXN rose about 11% on the day. This breaks what had been a pretty steady trend lower over the past 4 months in which those measured have declined some 40% since the market made a low on March 9.

But even as the market continued to rise in late May and early June, the VIX became sticky, remaining near 30 even as the 20-day historical, or real, volatility of the S&P 500 declined from 28 to 24 during the past month. This has led some to the conclusion that 30 was an important level that indicated the market was poised for a pullback. Yesterday’s sell-off -- and the accompanying jump of the VIX back above that round number of 30 -- seems to confirm this theory.

Using the VIX as a Predictor

One problem with this thinking is that the VIX is a statistical measure, and it's the result, not the cause, of any market move. Additionally, because it's a statistic, applying technical or charting analysis typically used on stock, isn't very effective.

But this isn't to say the VIX can’t be used as a predictive tool.

Most people tend to use it as a contrary indicator. That is, like most sentiment readings, when it gets relatively high -- an indication of fear or caution -- it's taken as a bullish sign. If it's low -- which is interpreted as complacency -- it's regarded as bearish.

The problem with this approach is that the VIX not only can stay low for extended periods -- it was at decade lows for most of 2006 as the market hit all-time highs -- but it can also rise during bull markets, such as during the tech bubble.

Probably one of the best ways to use the VIX as a predictor would be to use it for short time frames, when it doesn't respond as it should to the underlying market conditions.
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 



(3)
2009-06-23 11:36:12
what works, and when
I beg to differ with the following: "because it's a statistic, applying technical or charting analysis typically used on stock, isn't very effective." Indeed, Steve, with this statement, you have got my goat. (to quote Tim Knight..."I have many goats, and they are easily gotten.")

If the student were to look into the analysis of time series as a branch of statistics, they would find such concepts as moving average, seasonality, and trend firmly ensconced in the toolkit. For those tools, then, it matters not what kind of numbers comprise the time series.

Granted, some concepts must be considered as specific to trading, or price-specific. Support and resistance is one, fairly obvious, example. Another might be the psychological price point, which is closely related to the above.. except, in your piece, we see the idea that the VIX at 30 is being regarded as such a "price point".
This analysis is probably in error, according to the distinction I have drawn. But it is so very, very, human.
2009-06-23 13:05:07
what works, and when
I conclude that we agree; that analysing a VIX level via the "magic price-point" heuristic is a mistake, as VIX is not a price. Thanks for the dialogue, dlf.
2009-06-23 16:31:43
what works, and when
you make some good points and sense regarding "numbers being numbers".. but my point is that the VIX is basically a derivative or result. So unlike a support/resistance levels in which people tend to clump orders around.. new or stop losses.. and then can become self fulfilling. I don't think too many traders use a level of the VIX, say a close below 30, as an all clear buy signal to trigger trades.
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.