Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

WaMu's $7 billion Share Offering Doesn't Spell Bottom


Investors take on high risk for cheap options.

Washington Mutual's (WM) capital raising effort is being cited a sign of a healthy bottoming process.

Despite how it may be portrayed by others in the media, this is an all "common" deal. The distinction between common and preferred is solely due to the number of available shares. Once the existing shareholders approve more common shares, the "contingently" convertible will become common at the same $8.75 per share price.

As I have written previously, when things get worse, banks have to issue common stock. Because of how the bank regulations work, preferred stock "credit" for capital purposes is limited by the amount of common stock below it. With its first quarter writedowns, WaMu had no choice. And importantly, many other banks that have been to the straight preferred and convertible preferred troughs recently in size are in the same position.

Big losses increasingly mean flat out dilution. Ask UBS (UBS), ask Societe Generale. That the market is celebrating all this as a sign of the bottom confounds me. Closer to the bottom? – absolutely, but bottoms are when deals don't happen.

Be careful about the phrase "increased due to investor demand" – a near 30% discount to market is bound to drum up a little interest. Even with the deal's generous terms, some of the investors were given additional warrants for agreeing to a five year lock up. Don't underestimate the role of the regulators telling WaMu how much capital the bank needed to avoid action.

Finally, notwithstanding the company's current $12.00 trading price, $8.75 is now the ceiling for additional WaMu common equity, should the bank need to come back.

I have a lot of respect for the team at TPG and have no doubt that based on their prior experiences in banking crises, WAMU looks cheap, particularly at $8.75. I would emphasize, however, the phrase "based on their prior experiences in banking crises."

I think the problem for most market participants right now is that the assumption is what we're experiencing looks something like "their prior experiences in banking crises." And to me that's why we have seen such a big rally over the past two weeks – because, based on prior experience a rally feels very right, right about now.

But for all the reasons I have shared before, this one is different.
Position in SKF
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos