Alcoa: Financial Staying Power in 4D
By
Peter Atwater
Mar 17, 2009 10:45 am
Keys to surviving the crunch: dilution, dividend cuts, disinvestment and divestitures.
Back in January, I was struck by the phrase “financial staying power” embedded in Alcoa’s (AA) fourth-quarter earnings release. Last night, the company announced the steps it was taking to prepare for a potentially “prolonged downturn.”
More specifically, it's going to a) raise over $1.1 billion in new common stock and convertible debt to repay bank borrowings under its revolving credit facilities, b) cut the common dividend from $0.17 to $0.03; c) reduce capital expenditure and d) exit 4 businesses and sell shares of Rio Tinto (RTP), which it held in a special-purpose company.
In summary, the 4 Ds - dilution, dividend cuts, disinvestment and divestiture.
My purpose in highlighting Alcoa’s actions is neither to criticize nor to praise, but to focus on the long-term consequences of the company’s actions in the context of future earnings per share. Over the past 25 years, common shareholders -- not just at Alcoa but across the S&P 500 -- have benefited from the cumulative opposite to what we're experiencing today – earnings per share growth fueled by debt-financed stock buybacks, dividend increases, and increases in both capital investment and acquisitions (also often funded with high levels of debt).
Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, and corporations like Alcoa, out of a need for financial staying power, are acting accordingly. They're shrinking.
But, when I look at S&P earnings forecasts for 2010 and beyond, few seem to adequately incorporate the 4 Ds of financial staying power. Instead, earnings-per-share growth reflects intact entities’ rapid return to a 1990’s type economy, not re-sized businesses positioned for a prolonged downturn.
In reviewing balance sheets, I would recommend that Minyans focus more on whether a corporation is prepared for an extended downturn, rather than how poised the business is for rebound. As we're seeing across any number of industries, the price to common shareholders of preparation at this late stage is prohibitive. (For example, in Alcoa’s case, issuing new stock at prices not seen since the late 1980s.)
But those companies that want to make it don't have a choice. They must prepare or they will perish.
And so too must their investors.
More specifically, it's going to a) raise over $1.1 billion in new common stock and convertible debt to repay bank borrowings under its revolving credit facilities, b) cut the common dividend from $0.17 to $0.03; c) reduce capital expenditure and d) exit 4 businesses and sell shares of Rio Tinto (RTP), which it held in a special-purpose company.
In summary, the 4 Ds - dilution, dividend cuts, disinvestment and divestiture.
My purpose in highlighting Alcoa’s actions is neither to criticize nor to praise, but to focus on the long-term consequences of the company’s actions in the context of future earnings per share. Over the past 25 years, common shareholders -- not just at Alcoa but across the S&P 500 -- have benefited from the cumulative opposite to what we're experiencing today – earnings per share growth fueled by debt-financed stock buybacks, dividend increases, and increases in both capital investment and acquisitions (also often funded with high levels of debt).
Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, and corporations like Alcoa, out of a need for financial staying power, are acting accordingly. They're shrinking.
But, when I look at S&P earnings forecasts for 2010 and beyond, few seem to adequately incorporate the 4 Ds of financial staying power. Instead, earnings-per-share growth reflects intact entities’ rapid return to a 1990’s type economy, not re-sized businesses positioned for a prolonged downturn.
In reviewing balance sheets, I would recommend that Minyans focus more on whether a corporation is prepared for an extended downturn, rather than how poised the business is for rebound. As we're seeing across any number of industries, the price to common shareholders of preparation at this late stage is prohibitive. (For example, in Alcoa’s case, issuing new stock at prices not seen since the late 1980s.)
But those companies that want to make it don't have a choice. They must prepare or they will perish.
And so too must their investors.
Positions in SPY, JPM
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

business news
PRINT



















