Treasury Defends Bailout Bait-and-Switch
Regulators respond to scathing criticism from the Washington Post.
The bailout sounded like it was just that: Too good to be true. $700 billion deftly injected into the financial industry to sop up toxic assets, an end to ad-hockery that would not only rescue the financial system from imminent collapse, but would also turn a hefty profit for taxpayers.
With almost half the bailout money spent, Ford (F), General Motors (GM), and Chrysler teetering on the brink, only marginal improvement in credit markets, and an economy that's badly lost it's way, a rusty spoon isn't sounding all that bad.
Yesterday, in what can only be described as a rather unprecedented show of cowering to the American media machine, the Treasury Department defended itself ... from the Washington Post.
The Post ran a piece entitled "Bailout Lacks Oversight Despite Billions Pledged," detailing failures on the part of bureaucrats to keep tabs on their Frankenstein-ish bailout machine.
Oversight behind schedule, opaque initiatives and a program whose initial focus -- and what was sold to the American people -- has been all-but-scrapped: The Post tore Treasury a new one.
The Treasury, for its part, shot back.
Arguing that the Post's assertions omitted many key facts, Henry Paulson and company issued a press release dubbed "Setting the Record Straight" to try to quash the public's growing discontent with the bailout. They trumpeted disclosure of contracts and other pertinent information on their website, efforts to choose a new Special Inspector General for the TARP program, the immediate convening of the Financial Stability Oversight Board, and regular briefings to Congress.
That Treasury even responded at all is astounding. Their continued focus on an aggressive media campaign to sell what our friends at BTIG like to call "half-baked ideas" is evidence of just how little credibility regulators have left.
Surely, the officials dealing with a financial crisis they call the worst in our lifetime have better things to do.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin=
=3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by =
the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse=
d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi=
a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web=
site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address=
ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase=
, sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t=
o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D=
3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b=
e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with =
his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff=
may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in =
articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D =
ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc=
us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o=
r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d =
to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi=
ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi=
ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves=
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter