Anatomy of a Closed-End Muni Fund
How, and more importantly, why are leveraged closed-end muni funds created and structured?
Note: As a reference, check out my four part Bond Basics Tutorial: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.
If you were to go out and buy a long term municipal bond right now, it would fetch about 4.85-4.90%. And if you were to buy a closed end levered muni fund, you get about, well...4.90%. So why would anyone buy something that is essentially a municipal bond portfolio on margin? After all, the way these deals are structured is as follows: They 'borrow short and lend long' --in other words, they fund their leverage via money market (short term) floating rate preferred shares that are actually backed by the bonds in the portfolio. So let's say you borrow at 3.5% and lend at 5% and, voila! You capture the spread.
Enter the brokerage firms. When these funds are brought to market, they are typically offered at $15 per share but come with a hefty sales charge and fee of 7%! Yep, you get $13.95 worth of bonds for $15. A bargain? I think not. But in the new deflationary days of trading bonds or stocks, it amounts to what we might call a 'seven point rocket.' Pretty appealing for the brokerage community. Eventually, the market smells this out and the securities often settle at a discount to net asset value, sometimes as much as 15%. This takes the $15 to $13.95 to $11.85. Take a look at this chart of Investment Grade Municipal Income Fund (PPM) and you can see what I mean by the discount to NAV.
Why is this done? To generate the 7% commission and an annual management fee that generally hovers around 1%. Check out the table below of the fee structure…1.39% a year…yeesh!
And this business is being sold for 26x? You must be kidding me.
As far as these funds go, I play them from both the short and long side but very carefully and I generally look for non leveraged funds like NXR and NXQ if I want exposure. but to be frank, they are usually not liquid enough for me.
But all I can say is, buyer beware! Oh yeah, one last thing. They have all been cutting their dividends of late, partly due to the flattish yield curve and partly because the high coupon bonds they bought in the past are being called and they have to replace with lower coupons as you can see in MYI here...
Yep, that's right sports fans, a five year compounded growth rate of minus 6.22%. I rest my case.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter