Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

A Cynical, Contrarian View on Microsoft


Turning Skype into yet another utility in a bloated operating system is not the play they need to make.

A lot of buzz has been generated about Microsoft's (MSFT) deal to buy teleconferencing service Skype for $8.5 billion. A good bit of it has been positive. It's being heralded as a breakthrough for Microsoft: a realization that people want to communicate for little to no cost and they'll want to do it from a computer.

I, frankly, am not so convinced. I don't see this play as groundbreaking. Or Earth-shattering. Or revolutionary. Heck, it won't postpone Judgment Day, which we all KNOW is coming this Saturday, May 21. No, I see this move by Microsoft as being yet another defensive move: off-key, back on their heels, a day late and a dollar short. And I haven't even made any jokes about a blue screen of death when you launch Skype from now on. Oh wait, I just did.

But here's why I think this is the case: Everyone knows Microsoft is, if nothing else, the dominant software company for desktop computing. With its operating system, its Office suite, the server based products for email servers, databases and other products for companies, it has a near stranglehold on computing done by large companies and other large organizations. The old saying used to be you could never get fired for buying IBM (IBM). Well, that's pretty much the case now in enterprise computing with Microsoft, with some exceptions for companies like Oracle (ORCL) or NCR (NCR), who makes the Teradata database system. But those are niche exceptions. Microsoft is pervasive in big companies.

So if a company can be so well-regarded in one space, why is it so uncool online? Because Microsoft is older. Plain and simple. And I don't mean the company per se, but its culture is older. Professor Conor Sen and I talk a lot about Apple (AAPL) and while Apple has been around for just about as long as Microsoft, the fact is Apple is a younger company where it counts: on the inside. So while Google and Amazon (AMZN) are in fact, younger than Microsoft, Apple transformed itself to become a web2.0 company by changing its culture. This is something that many people feel Microsoft has not done.

It strikes me that Microsoft does two things quite well: enterprise data and gaming. The XBox 360 is an awesome platform and their database software and other analytics they're trying to embed in their products (think of all the fancy things Excel can do, in spite of its quirks and nuances). If you could combine the visual technology used in gaming to enterprise data, you'll be the king of the hill in the enterprise data space for the next decade and possibly longer. We are dealing with larger volumes of data and that data is getting richer and more complex all the time. Yet we're still supposed to analyze it with the existing tool set that exists in the business intelligence (BI) space? Give me a break.

We will need better tools to work with this ever-growing, ever-evolving landscape being created from everything we do and everywhere we go. When we check-in via foursquare, when we like something on Facebook or buy something on Amazon or eBay (EBAY), we are creating more data for others to sift through. It's a combination of geographical, consumer preference, social network and device data that's being generated here. And this is just one example. There are countless other examples where data can be intersected and aggregated into something useful. In education. In healthcare. In finance. It's everywhere.

Data is the crude oil of the Information Age and it will be up to someone to be the next ExxonMobil (XOM) or Chevron (CVX) or BP (BP) and turn it into something that we can use. Something that can improve our lives, but that's based on the lives we live today.

Microsoft has a place in that space, but turning Skype into yet another utility in a bloated operating system is not the play they need to make. No, the consumer's internet has passed them by. But that doesn't mean they don't have relevance in a new age that's dawning around the use of data.

New! The TechStrat Report by Sean Udall. Sean provides in-depth analysis, strategies and trades across the technology sector. Take a FREE 14 day trial.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos