Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Overestimating Future Cash Flow?


Persistent Intervention could chronically impair judgment, returns on capital.


Revvin' up your engine
Listen to her howlin' roar
Metal under tension
Beggin' you to touch and go
--Kenny Loggins

Many astute investors are offering cogent arguments as to why stocks offer long-term value at these levels. My personal analysis also detects stock-market value not seen in some time, although perhaps not as across-the-board as others suggest.

That said, a big risk to the "stocks are good value at these levels" assessment is that investors (me included) may be overestimating future cash flows.

As an example, consider a name that I'm involved with, Merck & Company (MRK). Currently, I'm estimating that Merck can generate $6 billion in annual free cash flow (FCF) over the long term (this is at the low end of Merck's annual FCF generation over the past few years).

The value of that cash flow as a perpetuity discounted at 10% is $60 billion. A ratio of Merck's current market cap of $59 billion (based on Monday's closing stock price of $27.91 per share) to this FCF perpetuity value equals 59/60, or about .98. As such, Merck is selling for about a 2% discount, using these assumptions and methodology. If we replace market value with enterprise value of about $53 billion, then this discount increases to about 12% (53/60 = .88).

The big "if" here is our assumption of future free cash flow. What if Merck doesn't approach this FCF level? If, for instance, Merck's long-term FCF-generating power turns out to be only $3 billion annually, then Merck stock is currently overpriced, selling for about 2 times fair value.

How might such a situation come about? Well, Merck could run into business- or industry-specific problems that drastically reduce its earning power, such as an unproductive drug pipeline, increased bargaining power of buyers, legal actions, etc.

While such events are certainly within the spectrum of possibilities, I'm more concerned about changes to overall market structure that could chronically impair capital returns at firms across the board - not just at Merck.

Specifically, I'm worried about the long-term consequences of pervasive bureaucratic intervention in markets that we've experienced - and may continue to experience moving forward. Persistent government meddling dramatically increases the probability of capital misallocation over time. Future returns on that capital and resulting free cash flows will almost certainly be weakened.

This is important because, as noted by John Hussman, among others, stock valuations depend more on cash flow far into the future than on cash flows in the near term.

If returns on capital will indeed be chronically impaired, then those who are valuing stocks under the assumption that equities will ultimately revert toward historical cash-generation patterns may produce overly optimistic forecasts.

The boilerplate warning that "past performance may not be indicative of future returns'" seems particularly appropriate when governments are assuming more control over markets.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
Position in MRK

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos