Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Betting on Financial Armageddon, Part 2

By

How we've arrived at Judgment Day.

PrintPRINT
Editor's Note: This is Part 2 of a 2-part series. Part 1 can be found here.


Ratings to Collateral to Ratings: A Vicious Cycle


What's a recipe for a perfect financial storm? Let's make a massive amount of bad loans and get them on the books of the major financial institutions. Then let's have the loans start to go bad. Throw in some general panic as everyone tries to sell the loans. Unfortunately, no one is buying.

Let's make a new rule that you have to mark your illiquid securities to the last price paid by someone desperate to sell. That means that many institutions now have to mark down their capital. Then, rating agencies mark down the ratings of the institutions which, of course, means that it costs them more to raise capital at a time when they can't get it which means they get lower ratings and so on. It becomes a vicious cycle.
Minyanville's Why Wall Street Will Never Be the Same
In the early 80s, every major US bank was bankrupt because they had loaned Latin American countries far more than the capital they had on the books. The Latin American countries defaulted. If the US banks had been forced to mark to market, they would have all gone down, taking the US economy along with them. The Fed simply allowed them to carry the loans at book value, offering liquidity and allowing the banks time to make enough money to eventually write off the loans.

While nice in theory, the current mark to market rule works in normal times. But it has the unintended consequence of making things worse during a crisis. Why should an institution have to write down a security which over time is going to pay back the lion's share of its value just because a severely stressed institution was forced to sell it at a very low price in a time of crisis?

Yes, investors need to know what is on the books of the companies in which we invest. But it's somewhat like my bank asking me to mark to market my home and pricing my loan daily based on that new price. If my neighbor loses his job and sells his home at auction, does that mean my home is now worth less two years from now? An even better analogy: If I'm renting that home to a very good tenant, does my neighbor's price impair my income?

I'm a fan of mark to market pricing. But we need to think through what a market price is. Not all things can be easily marked to market. This is doubly true when "market price" is a nebulous index of mortgage securities that may or may not have a fundamental relationship with an illiquid security on the books of an institution that has no intention of selling.

It's one thing to require that you mark your stocks or bonds to market values. It's another thing entirely to require it of all mortgage backed securities.

FASB 157 needs to be amended this week. If Congress can create a new Resolution Trust Corp in a week, then surely the accounting board, with the suggestion of Treasury, can figure out a better way to price illiquid securities.
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE