Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

The Government: Your Portfolio Manager

By

State control of banks seeming more and more plausible.

PrintPRINT
Been away so long I hardly knew the place
Gee, it's good to be back home
Leave it till tomorrow to unpack my case
Honey disconnect the phone
I'm back in the USSR
You don't know how lucky you are, boy
Back in the USSR

"Back in the USSR," The Beatles


Welcome to Socialism

Allow me to be frank (of course, I've never had a problem with it before): I'm angry about what's happening to our once-great country. I've spent the past 30 years trying to understand free markets, and the concept of risk versus reward. I've attempted to understand macro-economics, and to protect both my own personal wealth and the wealth entrusted to me by my clients. I have, at times, made some unpopular predictions that have fortunately played out well (at least for the most part).

What gets me, though, is the fact that I no longer seem to have a choice what assets are in my portfolio. And you, as a US citizen, no longer seem to have a choice as to what assets are in your portfolio.

During the late 1990s, I began to see a gargantuan debt bubble forming, and I believed it would eventually burst. Debt was growing rampantly everywhere and at every level - government, individuals and corporations. We had a Fed Chairman growing the money supply at alarming rates and, in August 1998, he began the first in a string of interventions that persist up to the present moment.

During the LTCM crisis in August 1998, Alan Greenspan stepped into the market for an intra-day rate cut. Not coincidentally, this was done during options expiration week, as are most intrusions.

Let's face it: Greenspan, even for his lack of ability as Fed Chairman, was one heck of a stock market technician. During options expiration week, when many market speculators are "short gamma" -- short call options, as they decay fastest during expirations week -- you get the most bang for your buck by intervening then. Or perhaps you get the best bang with my buck, and your buck. And the age of intervention was born.

I must admit I've been on both sides of the interruptions. In early 2001, I was long the QQQQ (the NASDAQ 100 ETF) and made 5% in an hour. The next time, in April 2001, I was short - and promptly lost 5%. What a country.
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE