The Moral Hazard Club
Taxpayers pick up tab for bank blunders.
A market in which prices are determined by the free interchange of supply and demand.
- Bloomberg financial definition
A dilemma that arises when government officials take steps to bail out countries or businesses that are in serious financial trouble. Although the action may help prevent widespread financial turmoil, thereby protecting innocent parties, it creates an expectation that governments will always come to the aid of failing countries and companies, potentially increasing risky behavior because there is no penalty.
- Webster's Dictionary
Saying Goodbye to the Free and Open Market System
I learned in Economics 101 the intersection of supply and demand was defined as "the price at which the highest buying and lowest selling price exist on a specific security at a particular time and place." I also learned about "social Darwinism," whereby the most fit and prudent survive and the weak suffer and or fail.
Under these rules, banks and brokers that made poor loans would lose money and possibly fail. Those that loaned prudently prospered at the expense of their less talented competitors. Unfortunately, many of these rules have changed or been eliminated by government institutions like the Federal Reserve Bank and the Treasury Department.
Why is this a problem? There are some favored parties -- such as brokerage firms and commercial banks -- that have managed their finances so imprudently they need to access special funding from the Fed. In other words, loans were made to borrowers that had no right getting a mortgage in the first place. These mortgages were often without full -- if any -- documentation and with barely any equity down. As housing prices have fallen, many homeowners now find themselves in a negative equity position.
Whether this low quality lending practice was the fault of the borrower or the lender (or most likely a combination thereof), there was considerable lack of prudence by the lenders. Many mortgage companies (251 at last count, according to www.ml-implode.com) have been forced out of business.
Certainly these companies went out of business due to their poor lending practices. But what about the people that borrowed the money? At the peak of the real estate craze, the website www.condoflip.com was hot. The new hot website is www.foreclosure.com, which has over 1.7 million listings.
It's truly amazing how full circle we have come in such a short period of time. Millions of Americans are losing their homes and now their jobs as the unemployment rate begins to rise. Delinquency rates on all sorts of mortgages -- not just sub-prime -- are on the rise in a big way.
Seriously Delinquent and Mortgage Loan Foreclosure Rates
Click to enlarge image
Subprime and Prime Seriously Delinquent Mortgage Rates
Click to enlarge image
Manufacturing jobs are being lost at a frightening pace in the U.S. as jobs are exported overseas. This brings me to the real problem that exists in the financial markets today.
The 'Moral Hazard Club' - How Do I Get In?
When the subprime crisis began to accelerate in the summer of 2007, it became clear what the market created by turning low quality loans into esoteric securities was unwinding. It's simple to see now that the genesis of the crisis was the bad mortgages themselves. And until the mortgages begin to perform, we're simply placing a trillion dollar band-aid on the financial system.
Broker-dealers and banks ended up with the esoteric securities on their own balance sheets and were forced to write down the value of the assets.
Please note the term "write down," which is rather different than "write off." When you write down an asset, the hope is you may be able to write the asset back up at some point in the future. When you write something off, it is permanently gone from your balance sheet.
As write-downs continue, the banks and brokers are forced to go hat-in-hand around the globe seeking capital just to remain solvent. So far, with the exclusion of Bear Stearns (BSC), banks and brokers have been able to raise capital, although they've been forced to pay onerous rates that are sure to reduce profitability for years to come.
In the table below, you can see that banks and brokers have been forced to write down over $231 billion since last summer.
Click to enlarge image
Further, banks and brokers are told to value their levered balance sheet in three distinct types:
Level I: Mark to Market - readily observable market prices.
Level II: Assets that aren't actively traded, but have quoted market prices for similar instruments - otherwise known as 'mark to model.'
Level III: Assets that have model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable-otherwise known as 'mark to myth' or 'mark to management's best guess,' 'mark to a hope & a prayer,' etc...
When you add up all the Level II assets by just the eight largest holders in the U.S: JP Morgan (JPM), Citibank (C), Bank of America (BAC), Merrill Lynch (MER), Goldman Sachs (GS), Bear, Morgan Stanley (MS) and Lehman Brothers (LEH), it comes to a staggering $5 trillion - nearly half the size of the economy. Level III assets are nearly $600 billion.
Is the Fed big enough to bail out all these assets? My best guess is probably not, and more firms will fail. If the loans and economy both don't start performing, these failures will happen more quickly, which is why my firm continues to avoid credit risk. It's not hard to envision an acceleration of this process if the market starts to believe the special loan facilities and other funding processes artificially created to deal with this mess cease to work.
The Federal Reserve, clearly in panic mode, began changing the rules under which financial markets has operated for many decades. In the table below, you'll see just how desperate it's have become.
Click to enlarge image
I know some people applaud the Fed for being creative. I believe it's played the ultimate moral hazard cards for investment banks. The banks take low quality loans, turn them into esoteric securities, sell them to investors, pay themselves huge bonuses, lever their balance sheets with esoteric securities and are then allowed to simply ship them off to Fed in exchange for Treasuries. The Fed has now become nothing more than a hedge fund in disguise. The notable exception is that unlike a fund like ours, the Fed doesn't have a 'P & L'. The Fed can take these securities onto its balance sheet -- just like the Resolution Trust Corporation did in the early 1990's -- except eventually the assets will probably be written down and taxpayers will foot the bill.
What strikes me as particularly odd is that there seems to be some favoritism displayed here by the Fed. Millions of people have lost their homes or will likely soon lose their homes, the economy is sinking into recession, companies are going bankrupt and what do we do? We allow brokerage firms and banks to shamelessly exchange their 'supposedly AAA rated Mortgage Backed Securities' for Treasury securities of the Federal Reserve.
I use the word 'supposedly' because if they were really AAA and had a market, why wouldn't these firms just sell them in the open market? Because there is no market.
I've been referring to our economy as an 'asset based economy,' one based on high levels of money and credit growth, for the better part of ten years. Now credit growth and leverage have finally caught up with the creators of this mess, namely the Fed and the broker-dealers themselves. Since the government has begun to rescue them from their own self inflicted wounds, I guess you can call the dealer community 'the Moral Hazard Club'.
What I want to know is why I didn't get an invitation into the club. We manage money on behalf of clients and ourselves, yet when we make mistakes, I can't just call up Chairman Bernanke and ask how I exchange my mistakes for Treasuries at 2.5% per year. It would be nice -- and would feel shameless -- but I have to admit that if I had a free put option underneath every trade, I would take a lot more risk. Wouldn't you?
The Problem with the Moral Hazard Card
Suppose an investor correctly made a directional credit bet against Bear Stearns via purchasing a 5-year Credit Default Swap. As Bear approaches bankruptcy, the Fed and Treasury Department offered a sweetheart deal to JP Morgan and tossed in a $29 billion backstop against Bear's worst assets.
Because the Fed intervened, the buyer of CDS that should have profited would have gotten killed. The price of 5-Year Bear Stearns CDS went from 200 basis points to 800 basis points to 100 basis points. Had Bear gone under as a free market would suggest it should have, the CDS buyer would have profited from his accurate bet.
5-year Bear Stearns CDS
Click to enlarge image
If the bailout of Bear becomes a trend -- as I suspect it will -- then measuring risk and reward and establishing positions will become a bit more difficult than in the past. Our firm prides itself on having gotten the macro-economic picture mostly right over the years, but when the Fed and Treasury intervene it makes us play a little closer to the vest.
It's hard enough to get the big picture right, but even harder to get it right and lose as intervention continues - we just never know what intervention, new facility or surprise rate cut will greet us when we walk in each morning. It's a bit frustrating, but to be frank, we have to observe actions of the markets and invest accordingly, even if we miss out on a little bit of upside that was a result of outside forces.
For example, as I write this, I just read that the Bank of England will offer similar terms to British Banks. I guess the 'Moral Hazard Club' just got a little bigger! I'm still waiting for my invitation, but I suppose I shouldn't hold my breath.
The Balance Sheet of the Federal Reserve System
Each week the Fed publishes its balance sheet on Friday afternoon as of the prior day's close (see below as of April 17th, 2008). Taking one glimpse at the balance sheet is enough to make a grown man cry.
Click to enlarge image
The Fed is slowly becoming the dumping ground for dealers and banks - members of the 'Moral Hazard Club.' It's is running out of capital, and quickly.
The problem assets (at least the ones we know about) are way too large for the Fed to completely absorb. It's waiting and hoping the economy and credit markets stabilize before it runs out of ammunition.
Because we haven't yet received our invitation to this exclusive club of value destroyers, we will continue our cautious view until such time we are convinced that the worst of the credit crisis is behind us. I believe this will take more time than most people think, despite some ferocious bear market rallies along the way.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.