Madoff Fraud Hits Investors Worldwide
This morning in Europe, Spain’s Grupo Santander and France’s BNP Paribas announced clients and shareholders may be out billions of dollars, according to the Wall Street Journal. In Japan, Nomura Holdings (NMR) admitted to losses of as much as $302 million.
Back in the US, the Associated Press is reporting that Goldman Sachs (GS) and money manager BlackRock (BLK) are claiming no exposure. Bank of America (BAC), Citigroup (C) and Merrill Lynch (MER) declined to comment.
Meanwhile, well-known individuals ranging from movie director Steven Spielberg to Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel are likewise seeing their investments evaporate. Spielberg’s Wunderkind Foundation, according to regulatory filings, had a sizable portion of its assets with Madoff as recently as 2006. Wiesel’s Foundation for Humanity was one of a host of Jewish charities said to be tallying up losses.
The $50 billion fraud is even wiping out certain funds of funds. Funds of funds invest money in hedge funds on behalf of their high net-worth clients; losses at once such fund, Maxam Capital Management, appear significant enough to have forced it to close up shop.
Stories are emerging about investors who acted as unofficial sales agents for Madoff’s fund. Many were dependent on the income for their retirement. The Journal cites one such case, in which a Boca Raton, Florida resident, a former securities analyst, brought in dozens of new clients without ever soliciting a single one; instead, people would come to him and ask how they too could receive what seemed like guaranteed income.
Madoff managed to generate consistent returns for years, appearing impervious to market ups and downs. And while many questioned the validity of his performance, evidence of any wrongdoing couldn't be found.
As the investment community beings to fully grasp the implications of the fraud -- the biggest in the history of Wall Street, easily dwarfing the infamous schemes of Enron and WorldCom -- it’s unclear just how shaken investor confidence in opaque investment vehicles now is.
During a time when money managers are desperately trying to assure clients they can navigate highly volatile markets, the Madoff debacle certainly isn't going to help their cause.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
As recent history has shown us, wealthy people are just as likely to cheat and trick other wealthy people out of their money.
A little regulation is a good thing, as it is far easier to generate profits through trickery and deceit than thru the creation of real value. The creation of real value is hard, hard work.
And I love Paulson and his other bald headed friend (Dr. Evil Jr). One must give credit to Paulson for being bold. But now we find that bailout money that is going through AIG went to pay dividends and executive bonuses, and not to start lending. The banks simply are taking care of themselves first. No big surprise. This is natural. Another reason why some regulation and monitoring is required.
I just wish I could get in on this gravy train, at the expense of the taxpayer. And even more fun is going to be if banks don't lend, we all will lose more money as the economy falters.
Seems to me that the rising tide lifts all boats, and the falling tide strands all ships. That included yachts.
It's real "Dr. Evil" stuff. "I'm holding the World ransom for $1 billion dollars! (But Dr. Evil in todays money that is not much). O.K. I'm holding the World ransom for $1 Trillion dollars" Right out of the movies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTmXHvGZiSY
Austin Powers - 100 billion dollars
It should be ...vGZiSY
Enough humor, got to make real money. And Jenny says, "let it go"
I pay my taxes, gripe about it all year....and then this: CitiGroup gets multiple billions from the taxpayer and a)pays 400 million for "naming rights" to a ball stadium i will never attend and b)loans Dubai 8 billion because, as their spokesperson states, "...they are a good credit".
I give up.
JPM
I forgot to throw in Sports geek ponzi in there.
I'm just a piker, but it always struck my that many people in the world are grossly overpaid for what they produce.
Could it be that what we are really seeing in the markets is the payback for decades of overpayment (well beyond any real value produced) to vast segments of society?
Just a theory.
















