Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Moody's Proposal Falls Short


As long as ratings agencies are paid by the issuers of securities rather than investors, they will be financially motivated to hand out generous ratings.

Ted: But why do they put a guarantee on the box then?
Tommy: Because they know what the sold ya was a guaranteed piece of [excrement]. That's all it is. Hey, if you want me to take a dump in a box and mark it guaranteed, I will. I got the spare time.

- Tommy Boy

Amid criticism of high ratings placed on mortgage backed securities, Moody's (MCO) is considering a new methodology to better inform investors of the risks inherent in structured finance investments.

The Wall Street Journal reports the credit ratings firm is considering making a separate ratings scale to be used for evaluating debt backed by mortgages and other products that may be less stable than traditional corporate, government or municipal debt. In addition, Moody's may place labels on particular debt instruments, such as "SF" for structured finance products, or "v2" for debt that may be extra volatile to clarify the risks of specific investments.

Moody's recently downgraded 22% of the triple-A rated CDO securities issued between 2006 and 2007 by an average of eight notches, even though AAA ratings are typically awarded to only the most secure debt – like that backed by the U.S. government – with an extremely low chance of default. Higher than expected defaults and falling home prices have impacted the performance of debt backed by subprime first lien and prime second lien mortgages, resulting in bonds with similar ratings not behaving in a uniform manner.

Moody's is also considering adding a warning label on certain structured products describing the limitations of the rating, cautioning investors that the investment may warrant additional due diligence and a higher risk tolerance. One fund manager quoted in the Journal said "If you're going to put a bunch of warning labels on the rating, I'm going to say 'What is the value there?' "

While the proposed measures are a step in the right direction in that it marks the first formal admission made by either Moody's or S&P that its ratings process is seriously flawed, the solutions do not target the root of the problem. As Professor Shedlock notes, the ratings agency model will not work as long as agencies are paid on the volume of deals analyzed rather than the accuracy of its ratings.

The problem is one of incentives. As long as ratings agencies are paid by the issuers of securities rather than investors, they will be financially motivated to hand out generous ratings. No amount of new labeling, fancy packaging or legal ruses can disguise the fact that in the for-profit business of rating debt, business is awarded to the firm that provides the best ratings.


< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin= =3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by = the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse= d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi= a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web= site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address= ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase= , sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t= o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D= 3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b= e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with = his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff= may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in = articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D = ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc= us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o= r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d = to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi= ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi= ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves= tment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos