Moody's Proposal Falls Short

By Andrew Jeffery Feb 05, 2008 8:45 am

As long as ratings agencies are paid by the issuers of securities rather than investors, they will be financially motivated to hand out generous ratings.



Ted: But why do they put a guarantee on the box then?
Tommy: Because they know what the sold ya was a guaranteed piece of [excrement]. That's all it is. Hey, if you want me to take a dump in a box and mark it guaranteed, I will. I got the spare time.

- Tommy Boy

Amid criticism of high ratings placed on mortgage backed securities, Moody's (MCO) is considering a new methodology to better inform investors of the risks inherent in structured finance investments.

The Wall Street Journal reports the credit ratings firm is considering making a separate ratings scale to be used for evaluating debt backed by mortgages and other products that may be less stable than traditional corporate, government or municipal debt. In addition, Moody's may place labels on particular debt instruments, such as "SF" for structured finance products, or "v2" for debt that may be extra volatile to clarify the risks of specific investments.

Moody's recently downgraded 22% of the triple-A rated CDO securities issued between 2006 and 2007 by an average of eight notches, even though AAA ratings are typically awarded to only the most secure debt – like that backed by the U.S. government – with an extremely low chance of default. Higher than expected defaults and falling home prices have impacted the performance of debt backed by subprime first lien and prime second lien mortgages, resulting in bonds with similar ratings not behaving in a uniform manner.

Moody's is also considering adding a warning label on certain structured products describing the limitations of the rating, cautioning investors that the investment may warrant additional due diligence and a higher risk tolerance. One fund manager quoted in the Journal said "If you're going to put a bunch of warning labels on the rating, I'm going to say 'What is the value there?' "

While the proposed measures are a step in the right direction in that it marks the first formal admission made by either Moody's or S&P that its ratings process is seriously flawed, the solutions do not target the root of the problem. As Professor Shedlock notes, the ratings agency model will not work as long as agencies are paid on the volume of deals analyzed rather than the accuracy of its ratings.

The problem is one of incentives. As long as ratings agencies are paid by the issuers of securities rather than investors, they will be financially motivated to hand out generous ratings. No amount of new labeling, fancy packaging or legal ruses can disguise the fact that in the for-profit business of rating debt, business is awarded to the firm that provides the best ratings.


GET THESE INSIGHTS AND MORE IN REAL-TIME.  CALL 212-991-9357 FOR A 14-DAY FREE TRIAL TO THE BUZZ & BANTER OR CLICK BELOW.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • All the News and Insights You Need Right in Your Inbox | Sign Up for Our Free Newsletter

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS